"This is the largest awareness incidence study ever conducted and the results demonstrate that awareness occurs at a fairly consistent rate, regardless of location," said Peter Sebel, MBBS, a professor of anesthesiology at
The AIM study confirmed 25 cases of awareness out of 19,576 patients receiving general anesthesia. Results also documented an additional 46 reports of possible awareness where investigators were not able to obtain sufficient data to confirm awareness, and 1,182 (6 percent) reports of intraoperative dreaming.
The publication of the AIM trial follows publication of two additional anesthesia trials, known as B-Aware and Safe-2. Results of the B-Aware trial, published last May in The Lancet, documented that use of BIS monitoring to help guide anesthetic dosing reduced the risk of awareness with recall in high-risk patients by 82 percent. Similarly, the Safe-2 trial, published last January in the Swedish journal of anesthesia, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, documented that use of BIS monitoring reduced the risk of awareness in the general patient population by 77 percent.
"The anesthesia profession has a longstanding history of leading improvements in patient safety. As part of this commitment, awareness experts from around the world have collaborated to define the scope of the problem of awareness and to determine the impact of additional monitoring on patient outcomes," said Paul Manberg, PhD, vice president of clinical, regulatory and quality assurance for Aspect. "The scientific literature now documents that awareness with recall is a legitimate concern for patients and providers, and that BIS monitoring is the only technology proven to further reduce the risk of this rare, but important, adverse event."
Furthermore, a recent health economic analysis was conducted to determine a per-patient cost of BIS monitoring. The results, published in the August 2004 edition of the journal Anesthesiology, showed that the net cost of utilizing BIS technology is $5.55 per patient when the cost savings gained from decreased drug use and increased efficiency are considered. This cost can be further offset when the proven quality and safety benefits of BIS monitoring are considered, including better patient recoveries, increased patient satisfaction and reduced risk of awareness with recall.
Using a sensor placed on the patient's forehead, BIS monitoring translates information from the electroencephalogram (EEG) into a single number that represents each patient's level of consciousness. This number -- the BIS value -- ranges from 100 (indicating an awake patient) to zero (indicating the absence of brain activity). Using the BIS value to guide administration of anesthetic medication, in conjunction with other vital signs, allows clinicians to make better informed decisions to achieve optimal anesthesia.
1. Sebel PS, Bowdle TA, Ghoneim MM, Rampil IJ, Padilla RE, Gan TJ,
Domino KB. The Incidence of Awareness During Anesthesia: A
99 (3): 833-839.
2. C. Lennmarken, Bildfors K. Victims of Awareness. Acta
Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2002; 46: 229-231.
3. Ekman A, Lindholm ML, Lennmarken C, Sandin R. Reduction in the
Incidence of Awareness Using BIS Monitoring. Acta
Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004; 48 (1): 20-6.
4. Myles PS, Leslie K, McNeil J, Forbes A, Chan MTV. Bispectral
Index Monitoring to Prevent Awareness During Anaesthesia: The
B-Aware Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet 2004; 363:
5. Liu SS. Effects of Bispectral Index Monitoring on Ambulatory
and a Cost Analysis. Anesthesiology 2004; 101 (2): 311-5.
Source: Aspect Medical Systems, Inc.