Patients feel safer – and likely are safer – when they receive a surgical safety checklist and request that their healthcare providers use it, suggests a pilot study being presented at the American Society of Anesthesiologists PRACTICE MANAGEMENT 2014.
Use of the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), a quality improvement tool released in 2009, has been reported to reduce complication rates. The SSC lists specific tasks that should be completed during different phases of surgery. Examples include: reviewing the patient’s allergies before anesthesia, confirming the surgical site before the incision is made, and ensuring sponges and other instruments have been accounted for before the patient leaves the operating room (OR).
Seeking ways to boost compliance of the SSC, researchers at Tulane University Hospital and Clinic decided to involve patients. Researchers found surgical teams were more likely to use the checklist when patients were informed of the list and asked their providers to be sure to follow it.
“The checklist is only beneficial when it is used, and we found that involving patients helps ensure that surgical teams complied with it,” says Seth Christian, MD, MBA, director of quality for the department of anesthesiology at the Tulane University Hospital and Clinic, New Orleans. “Empowering patients to participate in their own care creates a culture of safety and makes them feel safer – and rightly so.”
The study compared compliance of the SSC in 61 patients who were not informed about the list, and 43 patients who were told about the list and given a copy, which included a place for providers to sign agreeing they would follow it. When patients were informed, compliance was higher for all 26 specific checklist items. The difference was statistically significant for 19 of the 26 items. For example, allergies were confirmed in 95 percent of the informed patient group vs. 69 percent of the uninformed group. The surgical site was confirmed in 74 percent of informed patients vs. 54 percent of uninformed patients. Sponge and instrument counts were formally reviewed in 87 percent of informed patients vs. 19 percent of uninformed patients. Actual performance of each task on the list was confirmed by students who were secretly auditing its use while observing the surgeries.
While only 35 percent of informed patients had heard of surgical safety checklists, all said the SSC made them feel more comfortable going into their surgeries.
The WHO SSC is divided into three sections: sign in (prior to anesthesia), time out (before the incision is made) and sign out (before the patient leaves the OR). Although Tulane uses a slightly modified version to include the addition of a section on pre-procedure check-in (when the patient is in the holding area, prior to being taken to the OR), researchers focused the study on compliance of the items on the WHO’s version of the list.
Source: American Society of Anesthesiologists