A team of Washington State University scientists has devised a method that could lead to the development of vaccines against some of the most troubling infectious diseases we facediseases that have so far been difficult or impossible to vaccinate against.
The new method allows researchers to rapidly screen large numbers of pathogen proteins, called antigens, for their ability to prompt an immune response in a host. Proteins with that ability are good candidates for use in vaccines. The method will be especially valuable in the quest for vaccines against persistent diseases such as malaria, sleeping sickness and syphilis.
Its very slick, said immunologist Wendy Brown, who led the research effort. Now we have a high-throughput way of finding antigens from any pathogen, as long as you have the genome sequence. To me this was a huge breakthrough, because Ive been spending my whole career trying to figure out ways to do this.
The research team included scientists at WSU and at the Rocky Mountain Laboratories of the National Institutes of Health. Their paper was published in the March 20 issue of the Journal of Immunological Methods.
A vaccine works by showing the bodys immune system a pathogen or part of a pathogen (usually a protein) so that it can develop cellular memory and antibodies that will recognize and attack the pathogen in the future. A key step in the development of a vaccine is identifying which protein(s) to use. Until now, screening pathogen proteins to find those few that might be good candidates has been laborious, time-consuming, and in the case of persistent diseases, not very successful. Brown said prior methods required about three months to produce and purify a single protein to test. With her new method she is able to screen dozens of proteins within a few weeks.
Browns group worked with Anaplasma, a bacterium that causes severe anemia in cattle. Anaplasma is the most common tick-borne pathogen of cattle worldwide and costs an estimated $100 million per year in lost animals and lowered productivity in the United States alone.
The new method starts with the pathogens DNA. Previous work by WSU scientists had determined the whole genome sequence of Anaplasma. By comparing that sequence with the genome sequences of better-known microbes, Browns team was able to pinpoint genes that code for proteins that stick out of the pathogens cell membrane. Brown reasoned that since those proteins are exposed on the surface of the cell, they should be visible to antibodies and immune system cells, and therefore could be a good way to target the pathogen.
Once the genes were isolated, Browns team made the proteins they coded for by using chemical machinery derived from E. coli bacteria. They then purified each protein to get rid of any E. coli proteins that were present. They did that by using a chemical that would specifically bind to the Anaplasma proteins. Brown attached the chemical to tiny synthetic beads and then poured the protein mixture over the beads. Anaplasma proteins stuck to the beads, while E. coli proteins did not and were discarded. This purification step represented a big advance over other methods, which have been plagued by contamination with irrelevant proteins.
Each purified test protein was then presented to T cells from cows that had previously been exposed to Anaplasma outer membrane proteins. T cells are the immune systems memory cells. In the body, when they recognize an antigen they have seen before, they trigger antibody production by other immune system cells. In Browns test, if the T cells recognized a protein, they started dividing and making interferon.
Using the new procedure, Browns team found T cells responded to about 20 proteins, including many that had never before been shown to stimulate a T cell response. The researchers are now testing whether any of these might form the basis for an effective vaccine against Anaplasma.
Brown said the new technique also will be a boon to researchers working on vaccines against pathogens that are highly contagious or especially deadly, such as the Ebola virus and the bacterium that causes anthrax. She is using it to screen proteins from Coxiella, a bacterium that causes Q fever and is considered a possible bioterrorism threat.
If you have the genome, you dont have to touch the organism. You can just start expressing all these proteins and test them, Brown said.
Source: Washington State University