News|Videos|April 22, 2025

Bridging the Gap: Why OR Nurses Must Understand Sterile Processing to Boost Safety

Sterile processing expert Kevin Anderson urges perioperative nurses to deepen collaboration with SPD teams to enhance OR efficiency, reduce SSIs, and improve patient outcomes.

Kevin Anderson, MBA, BS, CRCST, presented "Critical Sterile Processing Knowledge: Enhancing OR Efficiency and Safety " at the Association of periOperative Registered Nurses in Boston, Massachusetts, from April 5 to 8, 2025. The presentation kept the audience engaged, laughing, and learning.

After the presentation, Infection Control Today® caught up with Anderson. “[My presentation] was all about sterile processing [SP] and how nurses could implement some different practices to better partner with SP for better efficiency and patient safety,” Anderson said. “The key takeaway is that we have to get curious about SPD [SP department]. We must walk a mile in their shoes. Cross-training would be great; more than a couple of hours a day would be ideal, and a week would be even better. But get curious about it. Learn about insulation testing, learn about shavers, all these complex devices that we use every single day.”

During the presentation, Anderson began by stating that key SP procedures can enhance patient safety and reduce surgical site infections (SSIs). His presentation focused on strategies involving the operating room (OR), the SPD, and the SP manager. As a previous OR nurse, Anderson is in a unique position to understand both sides of the exchange. His presentation was to explain to perioperative nurses what happens in the SPD.

One of his first comments about the complexity of what happens in the SPD was, “If you’re not doing [SPD procedures] right, only a few minutes will suffice, I guess.” This comment drew a laugh from the audience. A few minutes are not enough to learn all that goes on in an SPD. He explained in depth how SPD processes are “time-consuming.”

Anderson discussed shavers, saying that these “complex devices” are a “known cause of SSIs.” He said that the implementation of strategies is at the point of use. He encouraged the audience to “educate yourself,” and to round together with the SPD and OR leaders.

He also discussed training and highlighted the CNOR certification, even for perioperative nurses, and encouraged SPD departments to bring in independent consultants to gain a new perspective on how to improve SPD processes.


Related to this article

Donald Sipp, Jr, MBA, RESE, CHESP, CHTI-2, CMIP, PMP, and David Green  (Image credit: author)
“Cutting” waste shouldn’t mean cutting people. At AHE Exchange26, David Green and Donald Sipp explored how EVS departments can improve performance by strengthening workplace culture, empowering employees, eliminating inefficient processes, and understanding EVS’s critical role in patient throughput. One case study showed bed turnaround times falling from nearly 2 hours to less than an hour, but the larger lesson wasn't simply about speed. High-performing EVS operations begin with a strong foundation.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
Sadé L. Rolon, MBA, CMIP, CHESP, T-CHEST, T-CSCT, the regional director of operations for Sodexo’s Healthcare Division,  Julie Mangino, MD, infectious disease specialist at The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH,  James “JJ” Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, the university director of buildings & grounds at UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut,  Christopher Dugard, MS, director for the Division of Infection Control Devices in the Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices, FDA/Center for Devices and Radiological Health.  and Elizabeth “Liz” Claverie, MS, (retired CAPT, 0-6) vice president, regulatory strategic liaison for Steris.  (Image credit: Author)
Can a UV-C robot make up for a surface that wasn't properly cleaned? Experts say that's the wrong way to think about the technology. UV-C can provide an additional layer of microbial reduction, but factors including shadows, distance, positioning, and exposure time mean it cannot replace thorough manual cleaning and disinfection.
Sadé L. Rolon, MBA, CMIP, CHESP, T-CHEST, T-CSCT, the regional director of operations for Sodexo’s Healthcare Division,  Julie Mangino, MD, infectious disease specialist at The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH,  James “JJ” Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, the university director of buildings & grounds at UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut,  Christopher Dugard, MS, director for the Division of Infection Control Devices in the Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices, FDA/Center for Devices and Radiological Health.  and Elizabeth “Liz” Claverie, MS, (retired CAPT, 0-6) vice president, regulatory strategic liaison for Steris.  (Image credit: Author)
During an expert panel at Exchange26 on whole-room microbial reduction technologies, regulatory and health care leaders discussed the distinction between FDA and EPA oversight, what constitutes a medical device claim, the risks surrounding unauthorized or off-label claims, and why IP and EVS professionals should verify a device's regulatory status rather than relying solely on vendor presentations.