What happens when one disinfectant cannot satisfy every IFU? At AHE in New Orleans, Diane Cullen discusses weighted risk assessment, documenting difficult decisions, and why infection prevention and EVS need to work together.
|Articles|November 15, 2016
Deliberate Exposure of Humans to Chlorine in the Aftermath of Ebola in West Africa
Advertisement
During the recent Ebola outbreak, spraying of the environment and humans, including healthcare workers, with chlorine was widespread in affected African countries; adverse clinical effects are reported by
A cross sectional survey by interview of 1,550 volunteers consisting of 500 healthcare workers (HCWs), 550 Ebola survivors (EVDs) and 500 quarantined asymptomatic Ebola contacts (NEVD) was conducted. Demographics, frequency of exposure to chlorine, clinical condition after chlorine exposure particularly eye, respiratory and skin conditions were noted. The length of time HCWs worked in Ebola Treatment Units (ETU), and use of personal protective equipment was recorded. Verbal consent was obtained from all participants and all responses remained anonymous. Permission and assistance from the guardian or parent was sought for those below 18 years of age.
493/500 HCWs, 550/550 EVDs and 477/500 NEVDs were sprayed at least once with 0 · 5 % chlorine. Following even a single exposure, an increase in the number of eye (all three groups) and respiratory symptoms (in HCWs and EVDs) was reported (p < 0 · 001); after multiple exposure, respiratory and skin symptoms increased. In HCWs, multiple vs single exposure was associated with an increase in respiratory (OR = 32 (95 % CI 22 –49) p < 0.001), eyes (OR = 30 (95 % CI 21 –43) p < 0.001) and skin conditions (OR = 22 (95 % CI 15–32) p < 0.001). The available personal protective equipment neither reduced nor prevented the adverse effects of chlorine.
Reported exposure to chlorine has usually been accidental. Despite the lack of evidence as a recognized outbreak control measure, deliberate exposure of humans to chlorine spray was wide spread in Africa during the Ebola epidemic resulting in serious detrimental health effects on humans. We strongly recommend that this practice be banned and that alternative safer methods be used.
Reference: Mehtar S, et al. Deliberate exposure of humans to chlorine-the aftermath of Ebola in West Africa. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 2016;5:45
Advertisement
Related to this article
Turnover pressure can leave critical OR cleaning steps unfinished. Karen deKay, MSN, RN, EBP-C, CNOR, CIC, FAPIC, examines common gaps in environmental hygiene and how shared responsibilities, attention to disinfectant contact time, and ongoing education can help teams strengthen practices between cases.
Sterile processing professionals face constant interruptions, cognitive overload, increasingly complex devices, and hundreds of IFUs. Randalyn Harreld, CRCST, FHSPA, explains why health care organizations must address the human factors behind SPD performance rather than expecting frontline professionals to simply absorb ever-increasing complexity.
This week on Infection Control Today, the stories ranged from emerging drug-resistant pathogens circling the globe to a landmark decade of surface science—all against a backdrop of ongoing outbreaks and a hard look at what the profession owes its own workforce.
At AHE 2026 in New Orleans, The Beryl Institute's Stacy Palmer discussed 8 guiding principles for experience excellence and why EVS professionals influence far more than environmental cleanliness. Their interactions, workplace culture, and connection with patients help shape the overall human experience of health care.
During National EVS Week, appreciation matters, but partnership matters more. Environmental services professionals bring infection prevention expertise and a unique understanding of the health care environment that can help identify barriers, improve cleaning and disinfection practices, and ultimately protect patients.
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
A 10-year NIH-funded study used Bayesian statistical modeling to examine the relationship between continuously active EOScu surfaces and HAI reduction. EOS Surfaces representatives discuss the findings, passive infection prevention, environmental recontamination, and why IPs should continue asking tough questions.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Infection Control Today
1
When the Ebola Outbreak is Spreading Faster Than the Response Can Follow
2
Pathogen Pulse: The Alarming Rise of Dengue in Florida
3
How Can OR Teams Improve Environmental Cleaning Between Surgical Cases?
4
Sterile Processing Burnout and Cognitive Overload: How Interruptions, IFUs, and Human Factors Affect Patient Safety
5