Read about a cluster randomized clinical trial that found that direct gloving without prior hand hygiene significantly improved infection prevention practice adherence among health care personnel.
Close-up hand male under automatic alcohol gel dispenser for hand hygiene.
(Adobe Stock 364444583 by bigy9950)
Adherence to strict protocols in infection control is paramount to safeguard the health of patients and health care personnel (HCP). One such protocol involves hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves. However, a recent cluster randomized clinical trial recently published in JAMA Network Open suggests that an alternative strategy—direct gloving without prior hand hygiene—may significantly impact adherence to infection prevention practices among HCPs.
The study, led by Kerri A. Thom, MD, and a team of investigators from multiple academic centers, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a direct-gloving policy in a hospital setting. This mixed-method, multicenter trial included 3790 health care personnel across 13 hospital units and was conducted from January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2017. The primary outcome measured was adherence to the expected practice at room entry and exit.
“A rigorous approach to evidenced-based guidelines is needed to increase acceptance and adherence while improving efficiency and decreasing unnecessary demands on HCPs’ time,” according to the study’s authors. “We found poor adherence with the expectation of hand hygiene before nonsterile glove use in the baseline period of this study at 35% overall, ranging from a low of 8% in EDs to a high of 63% in hemodialysis units, rates that are similar to prior reports.”
According to the study’s results, the hospital units assigned to direct gloving, where hand hygiene before donning gloves was not required, exhibited a 46% increase in adherence to infection prevention practices compared to units following the usual care protocol (87% vs. 41% adherence).
This increase in adherence was observed even after controlling for factors such as baseline hand hygiene rates, unit type, and universal gloving policies. The use of gloves upon entering contact precautions rooms was also higher in units implementing the direct-gloving strategy (87% vs. 67%).
Caveats:
However, the study also identified some potential drawbacks of the direct-gloving approach. Specifically, it was associated with increased total bacteria colony counts and greater detection of pathogenic bacteria on gloves in the emergency department. In contrast, pediatric units saw a reduction in colony counts. The study found no significant changes in other units' total colony counts or the presence of pathogenic bacteria.
Adherence to expected practices was higher in the 6 units using direct-gloving (87%) compared to the 7 units following usual care (41%), even after accounting for baseline hand hygiene rates, unit type, and universal gloving policies (risk ratio [RR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.58-1.97). Additionally, glove usage upon entering contact precautions rooms was also greater in the direct-gloving units (87% vs. 67%; P = .008).
Reference
Thom KA, Rock C, Robinson GL, Reisinger HS, Baloh J, Li S, Diekema DJ, Herwaldt LA, Johnson JK, Harris AD, Perencevich EN. Direct Gloving vs Hand Hygiene Before Donning Gloves in Adherence to Hospital Infection Control Practices: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336758. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36758. PMID: 37883088; PMCID: PMC10603500.
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
New Study Explores Oral Vancomycin to Prevent C difficile Recurrence, But Questions Remain
July 17th 2025A new clinical trial explores the use of low-dose oral vancomycin to prevent Clostridioides difficile recurrence in high-risk patients taking antibiotics. While the data suggest a possible benefit, the findings stop short of statistical significance and raise red flags about vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), underscoring the delicate balance between prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.