In what it calls a move to improve the efficiency and transparency of the guidance development process, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing 47 draft guidance documents that were published before Dec. 31, 2013 and never finalized, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) is reporting.
According to an announcement in the May 6 Federal Register, the FDA has received a growing number of requests from the public to clarify specific issues, leading to the publication of draft guidance, some of which was written for industry, some for FDA reviewers, and some for both.
“Many of these draft guidances were not finalized … because of higher priorities and resource issues,” according to the announcement. The agency noted that new information and emerging technologies have made these draft documents outdated.
The withdrawn documents cover a range of device-, drug-, and biologic-related topics, including guidance on ventilators, a primer on medical device interactions with magnetic resonance imaging systems, and recommended warning for surgeon’s gloves and patient examination gloves.
The oldest document slated for removal was one from 1988 titled Assessing the Safety and Effectiveness of Home-Use In Vitro Diagnostic Devices: Draft Points to Consider Regarding Labeling and Premarket Submissions.
The FDA has taken steps it says are intended to improve transparency in the guidance development process. In December 2011, the agency issued a report on good guidance practices. It lists the steps in the process, from guidance initiation, to the development of documents in working groups, through finalization.
At an agency workshop in June 2014, FDA officials acknowledged they faced a number of challenges in improving the program, including a lack of staff resources. Several audience members also voiced concern about what they described as the slow speed with which the FDA moves guidance documents from draft to final form. One attendee suggested "term limiting" drafts, suggesting a 24- to 30-month period. After that point, the draft document should either be withdrawn, or the comment period should be reopened.
Source: AAMI
Getting Down and Dirty With PPE: Presentations at HSPA by Jill Holdsworth and Katie Belski
June 26th 2025In the heart of the hospital, decontamination technicians tackle one of health care’s dirtiest—and most vital—jobs. At HSPA 2025, 6 packed workshops led by experts Jill Holdsworth and Katie Belski spotlighted the crucial, often-overlooked art of PPE removal. The message was clear: proper doffing saves lives, starting with your own.
Unmasking Vaccine Myths: Dr Marschall Runge on Measles, Misinformation, and Public Health Solutions
May 29th 2025As measles cases climb across the US, discredited myths continue to undercut public trust in vaccines. In an exclusive interview with Infection Control Today, Michigan Medicine’s Marschall Runge, PhD, confronts misinformation head-on and explores how clinicians can counter it with science, empathy, and community engagement.
Silent Saboteurs: Managing Endotoxins for Sepsis-Free Sterilization
Invisible yet deadly, endotoxins evade traditional sterilization methods, posing significant risks during routine surgeries. Understanding and addressing their threat is critical for patient safety.
Endoscopes and Lumened Instruments: New Studies Highlight Persistent Contamination Risks
May 7th 2025Two new studies reveal troubling contamination in both new endoscopes and cleaned lumened surgical instruments, challenging the reliability of current reprocessing practices and manufacturer guidelines.
From the Derby to the Decontam Room: Leadership Lessons for Sterile Processing
April 27th 2025Elizabeth (Betty) Casey, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRCST, CHL, is the SVP of Operations and Chief Nursing Officer at Surgical Solutions in Overland, Kansas. This SPD leader reframes preparation, unpredictability, and teamwork by comparing surgical services to the Kentucky Derby to reenergize sterile processing professionals and inspire systemic change.