|Articles|February 2, 2005

Infection in Breast Implants

Breast augmentation is the most frequent type of plastic surgery done in the United Kingdon and -- after nose reshaping and liposuction -- it is the third most common cosmetic procedure in the United States. However, infection complicates 2 percent to 2.5 percent of breast implantations, and is the leading cause of illness following such surgery. The comprehensive review in The LancetInfectious Diseases of infection of breast implants is particularly timely in light of the recent call for tighter regulation of the private cosmetic surgery industry in the United Kingdon

 

Professor Brigitte Pittet, of the plastic and reconstructive surgery unit, University of Geneva Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland, and colleagues provide a fascinating journey through the history of breast implants and review the myriad risk factors for breast implant infections, before discussing clinical features such as toxic shock syndrome and late infection occurring months -- or even years -- after implantation. Diagnostic and management strategies are proposed for such problems.

 

In addition, they discuss the idea that capsular contraction -- the leading long-term complication that follows breast implantation, involving the formation and contraction of a collagenous sheath around the implant, thus forming hard, spherical masses in the breasts -- may be caused by subclinical infection, and could be prevented by antibiotics.

 

Pittet comments, Patients should be aware that, similar to other invasive procedures involving the implantation of foreign material, breast implants may lead to potential complications such as infection or capsular contracture. In good hands, however, infection remains infrequent.

 

Source: The Lancet Infectious Diseases


Related to this article

A brightly lit Hospital operating room, a surgical team wearing gowns and masks.  (Adobe Stock 1790696595 by Damian)
Turnover pressure can leave critical OR cleaning steps unfinished. Karen deKay, MSN, RN, EBP-C, CNOR, CIC, FAPIC, examines common gaps in environmental hygiene and how shared responsibilities, attention to disinfectant contact time, and ongoing education can help teams strengthen practices between cases.
Donald Sipp, Jr, MBA, RESE, CHESP, CHTI-2, CMIP, PMP, and David Green  (Image credit: author)
“Cutting” waste shouldn’t mean cutting people. At AHE Exchange26, David Green and Donald Sipp explored how EVS departments can improve performance by strengthening workplace culture, empowering employees, eliminating inefficient processes, and understanding EVS’s critical role in patient throughput. One case study showed bed turnaround times falling from nearly 2 hours to less than an hour, but the larger lesson wasn't simply about speed. High-performing EVS operations begin with a strong foundation.