More than 94 percent of U.S. hospitals have centralized systems for collecting reports of adverse events, but only 21 percent fully distribute and consider adverse event summary reports, according to a study funded by HHS’ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
The new study published in the Dec. 8 issue of Quality and Safety in Health Care is based on a national survey of more than 1,600 hospitals. Hospitals participating in the random, voluntary survey described how their adverse event reporting systems work, the status of reporting practices, and how they use reporting to improve care.
Adverse events are unintended injuries that occur due to flaws in patient care rather than disease progression. In its seminal 1999 report, To Err is Human: Building a Better Health System, the Institute of Medicine estimated that 44,000 to 98,000 people die each year as a result of preventable medical errors. The AHRQ-funded report highlighted the importance of adverse event reporting as a necessary foundation for improving patient safety. The report said fragmented reporting systems were a barrier to patient safety improvements.
According to the new AHRQ-funded study, successful reporting systems share common elements, including provisions that protect the privacy of staff who report adverse events; encourage reporting by a range of hospital staff; and distribute timely summary reports that are reviewed by senior-level staff and used to develop event reduction strategies.
The survey found only 32 percent of hospitals have established “supportive environments” that allow anonymous reporting. Only 13 percent have broad staff involvement in reporting adverse events (96 percent of adverse events are submitted by nursing staff members). Authors said study results provide a baseline for future evaluations of how hospitals report adverse events.
The study, “Adverse Event Reporting Practices by U. S. Hospitals: Results of a National Survey,” was conducted jointly by AHRQ researchers James Battles, PhD, and William Munier, MD, and researchers from the RAND Corporation and The Joint Commission.
The study comes at a time when patient safety initiatives are gaining momentum. On Nov. 21, the Department of Health and Human Services published the final rule for the establishment of Patient Safety Organizations. The rule’s effective date is Jan. 19, 2009. The creation of PSOs, authorized by the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005, helps remove barriers – the fear of legal liability or sanctions – that clinicians and health care organizations currently face related to patient safety event reporting. Information reported to PSOs from providers is held confidential and privileged. This will allow PSOs to provide feedback to providers for improvements in quality and safety.
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
New Study Explores Oral Vancomycin to Prevent C difficile Recurrence, But Questions Remain
July 17th 2025A new clinical trial explores the use of low-dose oral vancomycin to prevent Clostridioides difficile recurrence in high-risk patients taking antibiotics. While the data suggest a possible benefit, the findings stop short of statistical significance and raise red flags about vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), underscoring the delicate balance between prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.