Zoungrana, et al. (2013) say the consolidation of sterilization at the same surgical services site is the only way for institutions to maintain internal control of the sterilization process for medical devices. They report on their audit of the sterilization of medical services in surgical units of their hospital that have a sterilization department.
This descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted in seven surgical services departments with personnel involved in the sterilization of reusable medical devices. Data collection was conducted through individual interviews with staff, observation of practices and assessment of documentation available in the service.
A pre-disinfection occurred immediately after surgery in 93.03 percent of cases. Dilutions of the preparation of decontamination solutions were made randomly. During decontamination, the equipment was totally immersed in only 72.1 percent of cases. There was insufficient contact time between disinfectant and contaminated equipment in the majority of observations. Cleaning of all equipment including containers was performed in only 4.65 percent of times. Drying was done in the open air in 2 out of 5 other services. The cleaning material consisted of unsterile compresses (36.36 percent), already used fields (27.27 percent), sterile gauze (21.21 percent), clean fields (15.15 percent). Sterilization processes used: Poupinel (one service); Poupinel and formalin (five services); Poupinel, autoclave and formalin (one service). The researchers also found no registration of autoclaving parameters (temperature, pressure, time), and a lack of procedural steps in the sterilizing of reusable equipment.
Reference: J Zoungrana, IP Guissou, F Zongo, H Dhainsala. Poster presentation P393 at the 2nd International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control (ICPIC 2013): Assessment of the practice of sterilization of medical devices in the services of surgery of chu the university hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo (Chu-Yo). Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2013, 2(Suppl 1):P393.
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Getting Down and Dirty With PPE: Presentations at HSPA by Jill Holdsworth and Katie Belski
June 26th 2025In the heart of the hospital, decontamination technicians tackle one of health care’s dirtiest—and most vital—jobs. At HSPA 2025, 6 packed workshops led by experts Jill Holdsworth and Katie Belski spotlighted the crucial, often-overlooked art of PPE removal. The message was clear: proper doffing saves lives, starting with your own.