In a presentation at the International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC) held in Geneva, Switzerland June 29-July 2, 2011, researchers from Brazil reported on a study in which they sought to compare two disinfectants -- peracetic acid (0.1 percent) and ethyl alcohol (70 percent) -- on surfaces contaminated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
The study by Shimura, et al. was a case control study, developed on a flowchart. Six sterile glasses surfaces (40x30cm) were contaminated with a suspension with 104 cfu/ml MRSA by spreading with a sterile spatula and left to dry for 10 minutes. The efficacy of disinfection products were measured by imprinting rodac plates with Trypticase Soy Agar holding for 1 minute against the surface, before and after the disinfection procedure. The glass surface was divided in three parts and each part was cleaned three times. A sterile microfiber cloth (40x38cm) made from 10 percent polyester, 20 percent polypropylene and 70 percent viscose was folded three times, with a total of 16 sides, but using nine sides only; they were moistened with 50ml of 0.1 percent peracetic acid or 70 percent ethyl alcohol to clean three surfaces each. Sterile gloves were used and imprints from both hands were made on rodac plates, holding for 15 seconds. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours.
The median of surface contamination before and after disinfection with peracetic acid was 3.55 cfu/ml and 0 cfu/ml, for ethyl alcohol, 4.26 cfu/ml and 0 cfu/ml respectively. Imprints of gloves after both disinfections had no growth (0 cfu/ml). The test showed a bacterial load reduction although a non-significant (p>0.05) result comparing solutions.
The researchers conclude that disinfection with peracetic acid or ethyl alcohol with adequate technique had successful bacterial load reduction which contributes to environment control. They add that peracetic acid has a good cost benefit, however the microfiber cloth was degrading after five times of use.
Reference: CN Shimura, D De Andrade, E Watanabe, and AM Ferreira. MRSA on surfaces: is it possible to control? Presentation at International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC). BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P307doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-P307
Spring Into Safety: How Seasonal Deep Cleaning Strengthens Hospital Infection Control
June 13th 2025Rooted in ancient rituals of renewal, spring-cleaning has evolved from cultural tradition to a vital infection prevention strategy in modern hospitals—one that blends seasonal deep cleaning with advanced disinfection to reduce pathogens, improve air quality, and protect patients.
AHE Exchange Summit 2025 Brings EVS and Infection Prevention Experts Together in Columbus, Ohio
June 9th 2025The Association for the Health Care Environment (AHE) is set to host its largest event of the year—Exchange Summit 2025—from June 8 to 11 in Columbus, Ohio. With over 600 environmental services (EVS) professionals expected to attend, this year’s conference focuses heavily on infection prevention, interdepartmental collaboration, and education that empowers frontline health care support leaders to improve patient safety and operational efficiency.
Far UV-C Light Shows Promise for Decontaminating Medical Equipment in Clinical Settings
June 4th 2025Manual cleaning gaps on shared hospital equipment can undermine infection control efforts. New research shows far UV-C light can serve as a safe, automated backup to reduce contamination in real-world clinical settings.
Unmasking Vaccine Myths: Dr Marschall Runge on Measles, Misinformation, and Public Health Solutions
May 29th 2025As measles cases climb across the US, discredited myths continue to undercut public trust in vaccines. In an exclusive interview with Infection Control Today, Michigan Medicine’s Marschall Runge, PhD, confronts misinformation head-on and explores how clinicians can counter it with science, empathy, and community engagement.
Silent Saboteurs: Managing Endotoxins for Sepsis-Free Sterilization
Invisible yet deadly, endotoxins evade traditional sterilization methods, posing significant risks during routine surgeries. Understanding and addressing their threat is critical for patient safety.