US Withdrawal From UNESCO Signals a Dangerous Step Back for Global Science

Opinion
Article

In a decision heavy with consequence and light on foresight, the US has once again chosen to walk away from UNESCO, leaving behind not just a seat at the table, but a legacy of global scientific leadership that now lies in question.

UNESCO sign in Juodkrante, Lithuania (Adobe Stock by BOOCYS)

UNESCO sign in Juodkrante, Lithuania

(Adobe Stock by BOOCYS)

In a world where infectious diseases, climate change, and misinformation spread across borders with alarming speed, the need for global scientific collaboration has never been more urgent. And yet, the US has announced its intention to withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)—again. This decision, slated to take effect in December 2026, is more than a bureaucratic reshuffling. It’s a symbolic and strategic retreat from the kind of global cooperation that helps save lives.

In a new opinion piece published on LinkedIn, Infection Control Today®’s (ICT®’s) lead editor, Tori Whitacre Martonicz, MA, explores the implications of this withdrawal—not just for diplomacy, but for science, public health, and infection prevention. ICT® contributor and 2024 Infection Control Today Educator of the Year™ Shahbaz Salehi, MD, MPH, MSHIA, calls the move “a step backward” and warns that it risks weakening the very networks of education and science the world depends on to fight emerging threats.

The newsletter article, titled "A Blow to Global Science: US Withdraws from UNESCO—Again," traces the history of the US’s current rocky relationship with UNESCO and places this latest exit in the broader context of past withdrawals from key international institutions, including the World Health Organization and the Paris Climate Accord. It also underscores how global initiatives—like those supported by UNESCO in climate education, AI ethics, and gender equity in STEM—are vital to the infection prevention community and beyond.

The piece is not just a warning; it is a call to action for health professionals, scientists, and educators to advocate for stronger international engagement. As the article reminds us: “Infections don’t stop at arbitrary political lines.” For those working in infection prevention and control, the loss of US participation in UNESCO is more than a political headline. It’s a disruption to global knowledge sharing and, potentially, a threat to future preparedness for outbreaks.

You can read and engage with the full opinion piece on LinkedIn in the Behind ICT’s Mask newsletter. Subscribe on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/build-relation/newsletter-follow?entityUrn=7283245581337014274

Newsletter

Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.

Recent Videos
Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR (Photo courtesy of Amanda Heitman)
Set of bright yellow sharps containers with biohazard labels and red lids used in clinics and hospitals for safe disposal of medical needles and waste.  (Adobe Stock 1521632893 by Maksim)
DJ Shannon, MPH, CIC, VA-BC, FAPIC
Jordan Bastian, MPH, CIC, at APIC25
Jordan Bastian, MPH, CIC, at APIC25
Rebecca Battjes, MPH, CIC, FAPIC; Vidya Nankoosingh, MLT, CIC; and Peter Teska, MBA
Mark Wiencek, PhD
Rebecca Crapanzano-Sigafoos, DrPH, CIC, AL-CIP, FAPIC
The CDC’s updated hospital respiratory reporting requirement has added new layers of responsibility for infection preventionists. Karen Jones, MPH, RN, CIC, FAPIC, clinical program manager at Wolters Kluwer, breaks down what it means and how IPs can adapt.
Studying for the CIC using a digital tablet and computer (Adobe Stock 335828989 by NIKCOA)
Related Content