A medical device recall can create a lot of headaches for both manufacturers and the healthcare technology management (HTM) professionals in hospitals in charge of the equipment. With the number of recalls on the rise, how can facilities ensure they are prepared? The cover story in the latest edition of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI)’s peer-reviewed journal, BI&T (Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology) provides some answers.
BI&T Nov/Dec IssueMedical device recalls rose a staggering 97 percent between fiscal year (FY) 2003 to FY 2012, according to a report released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) earlier this year. The agency has three risk-based classifications for recalls. While the biggest increases were seen in the moderate risk Class II category, Class I recalls, which involve devices that pose the greatest risk to patients, represented 5 percent of recalls in FY 2012, up from 1% in FY 2003.
The cover story examines the reasons behind the increase and looks at the roles of various stakeholders during a recall. “HTM professionals play an integral part in the recall process,” says Nadia Ayoubzadeh, director of clinical engineering services at Allina Health in Minneapolis. They are typically the key players in creating an effective process for healthcare facilities to handle recalls. And they serve as the liaison between manufacturers and the end users.
The recall landscape promises to change thanks to the FDA’s new unique device identification (UDI) system, which will require all medical devices in the United States to have a distinct identifier. The system, which is being phased in over several years starting this past September, is expected to keep better track of the use and distribution of medical devices and equipment, crucial factors in ensuring speedy and effective recalls.
To help healthcare delivery organizations manage recalls, the article includes a list of nine best practices developed by several experts, covering everything from documentation to disposal of recalled products.
The article also provides an overview of efforts that can be taken by manufacturers and regulators to prevent recalls. And it summarizes the FDA’s latest guidance on the difference between a device recall and an enhancement.
In addition to the cover story, the latest BI&T features an interview with AAMI president Mary Logan on present and future association activities, as well as an article by a HTM professional who ran a biomed department as a one-man operation.
Source: AAMI
Unmasking Vaccine Myths: Dr Marschall Runge on Measles, Misinformation, and Public Health Solutions
May 29th 2025As measles cases climb across the US, discredited myths continue to undercut public trust in vaccines. In an exclusive interview with Infection Control Today, Michigan Medicine’s Marschall Runge, PhD, confronts misinformation head-on and explores how clinicians can counter it with science, empathy, and community engagement.
Silent Saboteurs: Managing Endotoxins for Sepsis-Free Sterilization
Invisible yet deadly, endotoxins evade traditional sterilization methods, posing significant risks during routine surgeries. Understanding and addressing their threat is critical for patient safety.
Endoscopes and Lumened Instruments: New Studies Highlight Persistent Contamination Risks
May 7th 2025Two new studies reveal troubling contamination in both new endoscopes and cleaned lumened surgical instruments, challenging the reliability of current reprocessing practices and manufacturer guidelines.
From the Derby to the Decontam Room: Leadership Lessons for Sterile Processing
April 27th 2025Elizabeth (Betty) Casey, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRCST, CHL, is the SVP of Operations and Chief Nursing Officer at Surgical Solutions in Overland, Kansas. This SPD leader reframes preparation, unpredictability, and teamwork by comparing surgical services to the Kentucky Derby to reenergize sterile processing professionals and inspire systemic change.