Improved universal healthcare is urgently needed to lower catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) for low-income tuberculosis (TB) patients in China, according to a study published in the open access journal Infectious Diseases of Poverty. Expanding universal healthcare could reduce the numbers of people affected by CHE.
CHE is defined as out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for healthcare that exceed a certain proportion of household income, leading to the sacrifice of basic necessities such as shelter, food and clothing. OOP payments for TB care include diagnosis and treatment, as well as non-medical expenses (e.g. transport).
The study by researchers from the National Center for TB Control and Prevention, China CDC and Shandong University, China, which involved 747 TB cases, found that a large number of households experience CHE -- up to 66.8 percent overall. China has the second largest national burden of TB in the world after India. Incidence of CHE is highest among the poorest households, 95 percent of which experience CHE, compared to 43 percent of the richest households.
In this study, CHE was measured based on the two most commonly used thresholds: 10 percent of annual household income; and 40 percent of non-food expenditure, the effective income left to a household once the need for food has been met.
This study is the first to examine the often catastrophic economic effects of TB care on individuals and households by looking at the incidence, intensity and causes of CHE from TB care. CHE incidence describes the number of households whose healthcare expenditure exceeds these thresholds -- 66.8 percent for household income and 54.7 percent for non-food expenditure. CHE intensity is measured by how much healthcare costs per household exceed these thresholds. On average, health care payments made up 41 percent of household annual income and 52 percent of non-food expenditure. As with incidence, intensity of CHE in China was highest for low-income households.
The researchers identified several significant causes of CHE, including unemployment, old age, and patient income. An increased likelihood of experiencing CHE was observed for households with fewer income earners (less than four members) and those that received minimum living security, a type of government subsidy intended to secure a minimum standard of living.
The study used data collected between April and May 2013 in three Chinese cities during a baseline survey for the China Government -- Gates Foundation TB Phase II program on TB control. TB patients were recruited using a cluster sampling method which divides a population into groups -- in this case three districts from each city and three townships/streets from each district. From each group, a random sample of 30 TB cases was selected, making a total of 747 cases.
All patients were interviewed face-to-face, using a standardized survey questionnaire which included questions on age, sex, education, household income/expenditure, health service expenditures, and non-medical expenses (e.g. transportation costs).
Measures of annual household income and expenditure on food and healthcare relied on self-reported information and may have been subject to recall biases. As the sample was restricted to TB patients who sought care in local dispensaries and designated hospitals, estimates exclude those who did not seek care due to financial barriers. Hence, the incidence and intensity of CHE may have been underestimated.
The researchers suggest that expanding what the free treatment packages will cover, for example by including transport costs and supplementary medication, and increasing the reimbursement rates and the number of people covered by universal healthcare is necessary to lower the numbers of people affected by CHE in China. This may also have positive economic effects as TB is most prevalent among 15-54 year-olds who make up the most economically productive sector of the population.
Source: BioMed Central
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
New Study Explores Oral Vancomycin to Prevent C difficile Recurrence, But Questions Remain
July 17th 2025A new clinical trial explores the use of low-dose oral vancomycin to prevent Clostridioides difficile recurrence in high-risk patients taking antibiotics. While the data suggest a possible benefit, the findings stop short of statistical significance and raise red flags about vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), underscoring the delicate balance between prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.