Hannah Schroeder, BSHA, CRCST, CIS, CHL, CER, presented a workshop at HSPA Annual Conference on how sterile processing leaders are turning to quality management systems like AAMI ST90 to drive data-informed decisions, justify resources, and improve department-wide outcomes through advocacy.
At the HSPA Annual Conference in Louisville, Kentucky, a pre-conference workshop was presented by Hannah Schroeder, BSHA, CRCST, CIS, CHL, CER, clinical education specialist at Pure Processing, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and focused on elevating sterile processing departments (SPDs) through a deeper understanding of quality management systems (QMS). The session introduced attendees to AAMI ST90—a lesser-known but powerful standard that complements ST79 and ST91.
“We [were able] to discuss things like understanding where stakeholders are in our quality management systems, who are our advocates, who are our end users, who gets to actually work this management system out?” Schroeder told Infection Control Today®. “And we talked about how to build quality processes and discuss some of those quality measures, and how do we verify the outputs that we're that we're presenting to our customer bases, our [operating rooms], our clinics, and ultimately, our patients.”
The workshop aimed to demystify QMS frameworks, helping participants define key components, identify stakeholders, and evaluate the quality outputs SPD teams deliver daily. Emphasis was placed on mapping out who is involved in quality—ranging from infection preventionists and facility managers to IT teams and vendors—and how this multidisciplinary support can be leveraged for greater departmental success.
Using real-world examples, the session explored how QMS data can tell a compelling story, from equipment performance and productivity trends to service gaps and staffing needs. Discussions highlighted loaner tray oversight and the integration of new products and service lines, reinforcing the value of robust quality metrics.
“We have to advocate and justify the need for new or updated equipment,” Schoeder said. “We need to advocate for an increase in teams, staffing, or flexibility in our scheduling. And some of those answers can fit into how do we handle our QMS, and then taking our QMS back, taking that story and utilizing it to answer those questions and to bring that justification forward. It gives us a clearer indication and a better avenue of discussing exactly what it is that we need.”
In today’s environment, where SPDs must justify requests for new equipment or increased staffing, QMS provides the evidence-based foundation to drive improvements. Attendees walked away with actionable insights on building support across departments and using quality data to champion meaningful change.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.
CDC Urges Vigilance: New Recommendations for Monitoring and Testing H5N1 Exposures
July 11th 2025With avian influenza A(H5N1) infections surfacing in both animals and humans, the CDC has issued updated guidance calling for aggressive monitoring and targeted testing to contain the virus and protect public health.
IP LifeLine: Layoffs and the Evolving Job Market Landscape for Infection Preventionists
July 11th 2025Infection preventionists, once hailed as indispensable during the pandemic, now face a sobering reality: budget pressures, hiring freezes, and layoffs are reshaping the field, leaving many IPs worried about their future and questioning their value within health care organizations.