The tsetse fly kills people and livestock in Africa. An MSU containment plan would be more effective and cheaper than current control methods, researchers say. Photo by Joseph Messina
For the first time, scientists have created a satellite-guided plan to effectively control the tsetse fly an African killer that spreads sleeping sickness disease among humans and animals and wipes out $4.5 billion in livestock every year.
Michigan State University (MSU)Â researchers developed the plan using a decades worth of NASA satellite images of Kenyan landscape and by monitoring tsetse movement. With unprecedented precision, the plan can tell where and when to direct eradication efforts.
Current control efforts in Kenya are ineffective and waste money by targeting tsetse-free areas, said Joseph Messina, associate professor of geography. Messina is lead researcher on the project, funded by the National Institutes of Health, to attack the tsetse fly.
Our model dramatically reduces the cost of controlling the tsetse, and its more effective, Messina says.
If applied, the plan would be effective in all of East Africa and other areas of the continent consisting of savannah, Messina said. The tsetse, which feeds on the blood of vertebrate animals, lives in 37 sub-Saharan countries and infects thousands of people and millions of cattle every year, affecting primarily the rural poor.
Funding for large-scale tsetse control has dropped significantly in the past 25 years, as has optimism that sleeping sickness technically known as African trypanosomiasis can be contained.
The Kenyan government would need an estimated $100 million to run tsetse control efforts in its targeted containment areas. The problem: It doesnt have nearly that much money and the government containment area is highly imprecise, Messina says.
The MSU plan would cost as little as $14.2 million. The plan relies on the use of targets which are sheets of dark-colored cloth sprayed with insecticide in more strategic areas. Targets are highly effective and the most environmentally friendly control method, said MSU researcher Paul McCord.
Current government strategy includes using targets and aerial spraying, but the spraying kills off beneficial species such as honey bees.
Theyve been trying to control the tsetse for more than 100 years, Messina says, but nothing has worked on a large-scale basis.
The MSU plan is based on a simulation that uses satellite readings every two weeks dating back to 2002. The plan takes into account a host of factors including temperature, amount of vegetation, tsetse lifespan and location of cattle and other animals to predict where the fly will be and when it will be there, McCord said.
The plan is highlighted in the May issue of the research journal Applied Geography. In addition to McCord and Messina, the paper was co-authored by David Campbell and Sue Grady of the Department of Geography.
Messina is affiliated with MSUs AgBioResearch and the Center for Global Change and Earth Observations.
Â
How Contaminated Is Your Stretcher? The Hidden Risks on Hospital Wheels
July 3rd 2025Despite routine disinfection, hospital surfaces, such as stretchers, remain reservoirs for harmful microbes, according to several recent studies. From high-touch areas to damaged mattresses and the effectiveness of antimicrobial coatings, researchers continue to uncover persistent risks in environmental hygiene, highlighting the critical need for innovative, continuous disinfection strategies in health care settings.
Beyond the Surface: Rethinking Environmental Hygiene Validation at Exchange25
June 30th 2025Environmental hygiene is about more than just shiny surfaces. At Exchange25, infection prevention experts urged the field to look deeper, rethink blame, and validate cleaning efforts across the entire care environment, not just EVS tasks.
A Controversial Reboot: New Vaccine Panel Faces Scrutiny, Support, and Sharp Divides
June 26th 2025As the newly appointed Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met for the first time under sweeping changes by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the national spotlight turned to the panel’s legitimacy, vaccine guidance, and whether science or ideology would steer public health policy in a polarized era.