Numerous studies have established the overall impact of nurse staffing levels on patient outcomes, but those studies have rarely focused on specific hospital units. Little is known about whether higher staffing levels in intensive care units (ICUs) or in non-intensive care units can improve care. It is also unclear whether the impact of nurse staffing is the same in safety net hospitals, which provide care to low-income, uninsured and vulnerable populations and tend to have poorer patient outcomes overall. A new study, published in the current issue of Medical Care, finds that higher staffing levels in both intensive care units and in non-intensive care units improve patient outcomes but not to the same extent in safety net hospitals.
Mary Blegen, PhD, RN, FAAN, professor in Community Health Systems and director of the Center for Patient Safety at the University of California San Francisco School of Nursing is one of the lead investigators of the study, which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative (INQRI). She led an interdisciplinary team with nurse administrators, health service researchers, and health economists that reviewed data from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), which included details on 1.1 million adult patients cared for in 872 units (285 of them ICUs) in 54 hospitals, and the hours of care that nurses provided to those patients.
Researchers found that while the staffing levels were similar in safety net and non-safety net hospitals, patient outcomes were worse in safety-net hospitals. In non-safety net hospitals, higher nurse staffing rates and a larger number of registered nurses (RNs) were associated with fewer deaths due to congestive health failure; fewer incidents in which nurses did not note or initiate treatment in life-threatening situations (failure to rescue); and lower rates of infection, including infection after operations (postoperative sepsis); and fewer patients who were required to stay in the hospital for longer than expected.
"Higher levels of nursing skill and more nurses providing more hours of care, overall, are correlated with better careshorter hospital stays, fewer infections and lower rates of failure to rescue," says Blegen. "We suspect that the increase in mortality rates due to congestive heart failure in safety net hospitals are a function of patients overall health, rather than staffing rates, but more research needs to be done. We also need to know more about how non-RNs affect patient care."
INQRI supports interdisciplinary teams of nurse scholars and scholars from other disciplines to address the gaps in knowledge about the relationship between nursing and health care quality. It is helping to advance the recommendations of the Institute of Medicines landmark report, The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health, which include fostering interprofessional collaboration and preparing and enabling nurses to lead change. By requiring research teams to include a nurse scholar and at least one scholar from another health care discipline, INQRI not only fosters interprofessional collaboration, the Initiative also ensures that diverse perspectives are brought to bear in research.
The Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
New Study Explores Oral Vancomycin to Prevent C difficile Recurrence, But Questions Remain
July 17th 2025A new clinical trial explores the use of low-dose oral vancomycin to prevent Clostridioides difficile recurrence in high-risk patients taking antibiotics. While the data suggest a possible benefit, the findings stop short of statistical significance and raise red flags about vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), underscoring the delicate balance between prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.