Logo Image
|Articles|March 17, 2014

NIOSH Seeks Comments on Respiratory Protective Devices

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces a notice of request for information and comment. This request for information was published in the Federal Register in an effort to:
- enhance harmonization of the FDA clearance and NIOSH approval process for surgical N95s
- solicit information regarding the potential to augment the current NIOSH requirements with additional testing to potentially streamline the approval process
- determine if there are gaps in the current process to more effectively meet the needs of healthcare workers
- provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of the current particulate filter tests.

NIOSH is requesting information and comments on the following:
1. Do healthcare stakeholders anticipate expanding the use of respiratory protective devices (RPDs) to include elastomeric air purifying respirators and/or Powered Air Purifying Respirators (PAPRs)?
2. For protections appropriate for RPDs to be used in surgical and/or nonsurgical healthcare environments, should NIOSH consider adding tests and requirements to the 42 CFR Part 84 conformity assessment process for splash/spray protection (fluid resistance) per ASTM F1862:2000a, or other appropriate standards? NIOSH seeks evidence related to the performance of existing products (NIOSH-approved, but not FDA-cleared as a medical device) against this standard and the prevalence and characteristics of actual sprays/splashes faced by healthcare workers during non-surgical patient care.
3. For RPDs to be used in surgical and/or non-surgical healthcare environments, should NIOSH consider adding requirements and tests beyond those provided in 42 CFR Part 84 for protection against flammability hazards per 16 CFR 1610, UL 2154, or other appropriate standards? NIOSH seeks evidence related to the performance of existing products (NIOSH-approved, but not FDA-cleared as a medical device) against this standard and the prevalence and characteristics of actual flammability hazards faced by healthcare workers during patient care (i.e., non-surgical activities).
4. For RPDs to be used in surgical and/or non-surgical healthcare environments, should NIOSH consider adding optional, supplemental filtration testing (e.g., ASTM F2101–01 (Bacterial Filtration Efficiency) and ASTM F1215:1989 (Particulate Filtration Efficiency)) in addition to the existing NIOSH filter requirements in 42 CFR Part 84? NIOSH requests evidence related to the performance of existing products (NIOSH-approved, but not FDA-cleared as a medical device) against these alternative filter test methods and the prevalence and characteristics of airborne exposures faced by healthcare workers during patient care (i.e., non-surgical activities). NIOSH seeks comparative results for testing against such candidate supplemental standards versus test
results achieved in the existing filter efficiency tests of 42 CFR Part 84.

Individuals wishing to submit comments to the docket should do so by April 14, 2014. Information requests can also be submitted by email to nioshdocket@cdc.gov. You may submit comments identified by CDC–2014–0005 and Docket Number NIOSH–272 by either of the two following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: NIOSH Docket Office, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS–C34, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226.

All information received in response to this notice must include the agency name and docket number [CDC–2014–0005; NIOSH–272]. All relevant comments received will be posted without change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. All electronic comments should be formatted as Microsoft Word. For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to www.regulations.gov.

NIOSH will determine next steps after all comments are reviewed and assessed. NIOSH intends to provide an entry to the docket regarding next steps no later than June 30, 2014.

Source: NIOSH

Related to this article

View more
Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC. (Image credit: author with AI)
Chasing the Bundibugyo Outbreak: How Static Numbers Hide a Moving Epidemic
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Read more
Health care workers from the US speaking with other health care workers in DRC. (Image credit: author with AI)
What Outbreak Metrics Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Ebola DRC Response
Is the Ebola outbreak in the DRC getting better? The answer depends on which numbers you examine. Several important indicators are moving in the right direction, including slower case growth and a declining Rₜ. But major gaps remain in contact tracing, testing, community deaths, safe burial coverage, and treatment capacity in some of the hardest-hit areas. ICT takes a deeper look at the latest outbreak data and why the numbers suggest cautious optimism, not victory.
Read more
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange26: Building Safer, Smarter Reusable Linen Programs
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
Read more
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
Once a Teacher, Always a Teacher: Why Infection Prevention Is Education
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.
Read more