One-Quarter of MRSA Bloodstream Infections Occurs in New Arrivals
One in four cases of MRSA blood stream infection in hospital occurs in patients who have just arrived from the community. These patients tend to be older and have been in hospital before. These results, published today, should help to refine infection control policies in United Kingdom hospitals.
In the past 10 years, MRSA infection has increased in the United Kingdom. The bacterium can infect many sites; one serious form of infection is that in which blood-stream infection occurs (bacteremia). A national surveillance scheme counts MRSA bacteremia by hospital trust, but it has not yet addressed whether cases of MRSA bacteremia are arriving in hospitals from the community.
Researchers at the University of Oxford analyzed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia in patients on arrival in two Oxfordshire hospitals over a seven-year period (1997 to 2003).
At one hospital, patients admitted from the community accounted for 49 percent of total MSSA cases and 25 percent of total MRSA cases. The proportion of methicillin resistance among patients admitted with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, rose from 14 percent in 1997 and 1998 to 26 percent in 2003.
Most patients (at least 91 percent) admitted with MRSA bacteremia had previously been in hospital, half had never had MRSA detected before, and 70 percent were admitted to emergency medical and surgical services. A similar pattern was observed in the other hospital.
Despite some study limitations, the authors conclude that, of the cases of MRSA bacteremia detected in hospital, a quarter occurs in patients who have just arrived from the community, and that this proportion is increasing. They call for additional research to be undertaken into the best way to recognize these patients.
Source: British Medical Journal
Newsletter
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
New Study Explores Oral Vancomycin to Prevent C difficile Recurrence, But Questions Remain
July 17th 2025A new clinical trial explores the use of low-dose oral vancomycin to prevent Clostridioides difficile recurrence in high-risk patients taking antibiotics. While the data suggest a possible benefit, the findings stop short of statistical significance and raise red flags about vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), underscoring the delicate balance between prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.
