By Rose Seavey, RN, MBA, CNOR, ACSP
A positive biologicalindicator (BI) can be a nightmare for the infection control, sterile processingand surgical staff. How can you be sure if a questionable product has been usedon a patient? The last thing you want to tell a patient is, "We 'may' haveused a product on you that was not sterile, but we are not sure. We will takeprecautions just in case."
How can you be sure if a questionable device was used on a patient? Theanswer is positive identification of products used on each patient, specificallypatient record cards. If a facility has a BI, having positive identification ofwhich patients the questionable items were used on is helpful.
At The Children's Hospital of Denver (TCH), patient record cards have beenused for the last seven years. These cards are attached to every surgicalinstrument set or package processed. Prior to sterilization, patient recordcards are attached to peel packs and wrapped items with sterilization indicatortape. Instrument containers used at TCH have a dedicated pocket to slip thepatient record cards into.
TCH uses a bar code system that prints identification labels for each set orinstrument. The label is attached to the patient record card along with thesterilization sticker that contains the sterilization load information. Prior toimplementing the bar code system at TCH, instrument identification was handwritten on the patient record card.
Ideally, no items should be released until the results of the BIs are read tobe negative for growth. Nevertheless, we know this is not always realistic dueto limited instrument budgets, increasing surgical cases and the push forquicker turnarounds.
When instruments are used ona patient, the operating room (OR) staff removes the patient record card fromthe peel pack, packages or container. The cards from all instrument used duringthe surgical case are collected, placed in a bag to contain them, and then apatient identification label is attached to the bag.
These bags are then collected for the entire day and sent to the sterileprocessing (SP) department where they are kept at least until all of thebiological results are read. If a recall procedure is instituted and not all ofthe devices were retrieved, we go through the cards to look for the items.Having the patient identification on the bag lets us know if an item was used onthat patient. We immediately notify the physician that indeed, a questionabledevice was used on the specific patient. He can begin any necessary precaution.
Rose Seavey, RN, MBA, CNOR, ACSP, is director of sterile processing and is2003 president-elect of the American Society for Healthcare Central ServiceProfessionals (ASHCSP).
AHE Exchange Summit 2025 Brings EVS and Infection Prevention Experts Together in Columbus, Ohio
June 9th 2025The Association for the Health Care Environment (AHE) is set to host its largest event of the year—Exchange Summit 2025—from June 8 to 11 in Columbus, Ohio. With over 600 environmental services (EVS) professionals expected to attend, this year’s conference focuses heavily on infection prevention, interdepartmental collaboration, and education that empowers frontline health care support leaders to improve patient safety and operational efficiency.
Far UV-C Light Shows Promise for Decontaminating Medical Equipment in Clinical Settings
June 4th 2025Manual cleaning gaps on shared hospital equipment can undermine infection control efforts. New research shows far UV-C light can serve as a safe, automated backup to reduce contamination in real-world clinical settings.
Unmasking Vaccine Myths: Dr Marschall Runge on Measles, Misinformation, and Public Health Solutions
May 29th 2025As measles cases climb across the US, discredited myths continue to undercut public trust in vaccines. In an exclusive interview with Infection Control Today, Michigan Medicine’s Marschall Runge, PhD, confronts misinformation head-on and explores how clinicians can counter it with science, empathy, and community engagement.
Silent Saboteurs: Managing Endotoxins for Sepsis-Free Sterilization
Invisible yet deadly, endotoxins evade traditional sterilization methods, posing significant risks during routine surgeries. Understanding and addressing their threat is critical for patient safety.