Researchers at Penn Medicine, in collaboration with a multi-center international team, have shown that a protease inhibitor, simeprevir, a once-a-day pill, along with interferon and ribavirin has proven as effective in treating chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) as telaprevir with interferon and ribavirin, the standard of care in developing countries. Further, simeprevir proved to be simpler for patients and had fewer adverse events. The complete study is now available online and is scheduled to publish in January 2015 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
“The observations from the study present simeprevir, peginterferon and ribavirin as a good therapeutic option for regions of the world where all-oral therapies are unavailable or cost prohibitive,” says Rajender Reddy, MD, professor of medicine and director of hepatology the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. “This is the only study we are aware of that directly compares telaprevir to simeprevir.” Telaprevir, another protease inhibitor, is an oral HCV medication taken up to three times daily, has multiple side effects and is less accessible than simeprevir. Simeprevir is manufactured by Janssen Pharmaceuticals.
In the U.S. and other countries where access to the latest research and treatment for HCV is available, physicians have moved toward all-oral therapy and away from interferon-based therapies such as these, as they are known to come with a significant number of side effects and are not as effective.
This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study included 763 adults with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, a form of the virus found in up to 75 percent of infections, and compensated liver diseases, who had previously not responded or only partially responded to at least one course of peginterferon and ribavirin.
Patients were randomized to receive simeprevir plus telaprevir placebo (379) or telaprevir plus simeprevir placebo (384) in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin for 12 weeks followed by 36 weeks of peginterferon and ribavirin alone.
The regimen of simeprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin proved to be as good as telaprevir and peginterferon and ribavirin, with 54 percent of patients in the simeprevir group versus 55 percent in the telaprevir group achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR), a lowering of the amount of virus in the body, 12 weeks after cessation of therapy. In prior partial responders, SVR was achieved in 70 percent versus 68 percent and in 44 percent versus 46 percent of previous non-responders following treatment with simeprevir and peginterferon and ribavirin and telaprevir and peginterferon and ribavirin treatment, respectively.
Sixty-nine percent of patients experienced simeprevir-related adverse events while 86 percent in the telaprevir group reported telaprevir-related adverse events.
“HCV treatment has been a moving target, especially for those who do not have access to or the ability to pay for the latest treatment options,” says Reddy. “With this study, we showed that simeprevir once a day was well-tolerated in genotype 1 infected previous non-responders, making it a viable alternative to telaprevir for a segment of patients with HCV.”
This study was funded by Janssen Research and Development.
Source: Penn Medicine
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
New Study Explores Oral Vancomycin to Prevent C difficile Recurrence, But Questions Remain
July 17th 2025A new clinical trial explores the use of low-dose oral vancomycin to prevent Clostridioides difficile recurrence in high-risk patients taking antibiotics. While the data suggest a possible benefit, the findings stop short of statistical significance and raise red flags about vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), underscoring the delicate balance between prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.