|Articles|September 1, 2005

Toronto Physicians Reveal Fears While Coping With SARS Outbreak

A new study of the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Toronto shows how fears of a virulent contagious disease can affect healthcare providers and reveals that some of those surveyed who experienced SARS-like symptoms during the outbreak still went to work. These results emerge amid current concern that another infectious disease, avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu, could cause a deadly global epidemic.

The study, to appear in the September/October issue of the journal Psychosomatics, used data from survey responses submitted by 193 physicians, including 45 who provided direct care in the three large teaching hospitals in downtown Toronto where SARS patients were treated.

Sherry L. Grace, lead author of the study team assembled by the University Health Network in Toronto, says the experience of Torontos physicians is proving enlightening. What we have learned, said Grace, are some basic things to better prepare doctors everywhere with the means for battling highly infectious diseases.

Over a five-month period, 247 probable and 128 suspected cases of SARS were reported with 44 deaths recorded, including one physician and three nurses. More than 50 percent of the Toronto SARS cases involved health care providers, with the outbreak causing widespread suspensions of clinical services and quarantines.

The main concern expressed by those surveyed was that the SARS outbreak diminished their ability to care for non-SARS patients and, as a secondary result, caused them to lose income.

Despite the fears and anxieties they expressed, those surveyed possessed and applied coping skills that proved fairly resilient and felt that it was their duty as physicians, according to the report, to care for highly infectious patients with life-threatening diseases.

Of the 193 physicians surveyed by mail, 35 reported experiencing SARS-like symptoms and 21 of them continued to work. The survey format did not allow follow-up questioning, and the authors recommend additional investigation of the issue.

Another finding revealed a racial component that many respondents felt stigmatized during the SARS outbreak by others who knew they had possibly been exposed to the corona SARS virus. The initial cluster of SARS cases occurred in Hong Kong. Among the Toronto physicians surveyed, those with an Asian background reporedtreported a far higher degree of stigmatization than their Caucasian counterparts.

Virtually all the physicians surveyed experiencing varying levels of elevated stress during the period of the outbreak. Those providing direct care to SARS patients report significantly higher rates of psychological distress (45.7 percent) than those not providing such care (17.7 percent).

A host of anxieties included concerns about getting SARS, dying from it, spreading it to others, especially family and friends, and being quarantined or otherwise kept from providing care.

Noting that public health officials increasingly believe that an influenza pandemic is in the offing, Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, called the Toronto study evidence of the extent to which we are behind in what must be done to prepare for a tragedy of epic proportions.

Our healthcare providers are going to need tremendous help, Osterholm says, adding that a pandemic will cause widespread dislocations and, in all cases, a lot of planning is needed to avoid the worst consequences that might befall us.

The SARS study lists issues to address: procedures for timely sharing of information to support physicians, appropriate infection control procedures, systems for securing health income during disease outbreaks, risk management for family members of health care providers, and measures for reducing the disruption a high contagious disease can cause for other clinical care requirements.

Reference: Grace SL, et al. The occupational and psychosocial impact of SARS on academic physicians in three affected hospitals. Psychosomatics 47(1).

Source: Center for the Advancement of Health

 


Related to this article

Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Health care workers from the US speaking with other health care workers in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Is the Ebola outbreak in the DRC getting better? The answer depends on which numbers you examine. Several important indicators are moving in the right direction, including slower case growth and a declining Rₜ. But major gaps remain in contact tracing, testing, community deaths, safe burial coverage, and treatment capacity in some of the hardest-hit areas. ICT takes a deeper look at the latest outbreak data and why the numbers suggest cautious optimism, not victory.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.