Two major healthcare organizations are joining forces to provide comprehensive benchmarking data to sterile processing departments at healthcare facilities around the world.
The Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the International Association of Healthcare Central Service Materiel Management (IAHCSMM)Â are teaming up to enhance and promote Benchmarking SolutionsSterile Processing, a web-based platform that helps sterile processing departments compare their budgets, personnel, practices, and policies with those at other facilities.
AAMI launched the online benchmarking platform nearly two years ago. Now by collaborating with IAHCSMM, the benchmarking tool promises to be even more robust. The collaboration is important because the two organizations have a combined membership of more than 26,000, which will help attract more subscribers and generate more benchmarking data.
Through this collaboration, members of AAMI or IAHCSMM will receive special discounts to subscribe annually to the benchmarking platform. Individuals can order the benchmarking platform by either calling 877-249-8226 or visiting www.aami.org/spb/orderform.html. The order code is: SPB.
In addition, AAMI and IAHCSMM have formed a 12-person task force to oversee the benchmarking platform, review the benchmarking survey and platform annually, and recommend enhancements. Rose Seavey, a sterilization consultant who will serve on the task force, called the collaboration a great step toward bringing quality to sterile processing.
It will give those in the field some ammunition to get the tools and resources they need to provide safe and efficient patient care, adds Seavey. Being able to compare a facility to like facilities will produce extremely useful real benchmarking data for such thing as budgets, equipment, practices, and staffing. That is the kind of data that healthcare administrations will listen to.
Â
The platform features more than 130 benchmarking and best practice measurements. It includes as an easy-to-use tool to help in the analysis of benchmarking data. Developed by leading sterilization and software experts, the benchmarking surveyexamines several critical elements of a facilitys sterile processing program:
Budgeting and financial
Sterilization practices
Compliance
Volume and types of work performed
Clinical relationships
Best practices and performance improvement
Purchasing decisions and participation on committees
Responsibilities and reporting structures
Staffing, qualifications, continuing education, and much more
Once a subscriber has entered his or her facilitys data anonymously, the subscriber can then compare the facility against others and customize the results for a particular region, type, or size. Tools and charts display the results in a colorful and easy-to-understand fashion. Subscribers receive access to the benchmarking platform for a full year; the ability to update, revise, and compare their data throughout the year; and access to sterilization colleagues and experts through a listserv.
Last May, a powerful new productivity component was added to the benchmarking platform to help departments assess staffing needs and productivity levels.
Sterile processing staffing needs and productivity levels depend not only on the volume of tasks performed, but also on the complexity of those tasks. In the productivity analysis tool, typical sterile processing tasks are organized into four categories of complexity. For each category, subject matter experts have estimated the amount of staff time necessary, on average, to complete the package, set, or tray correctly, including in most cases all processing steps (cleaning/decontamination, packaging, sterilization).
Using this feature, a subscriber can gain useful information in determining the number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) needed to accomplish a processing workload. Adding in the number of hours committed to administrative work yields the total number of FTEs the department should have, as well as a current productivity value. In addition, the overall workload intensity is calculated, allowing comparisons to be made between facilities with similar kinds of workloads (in terms of both volume and complexity).
The sterilization benchmarking tool was created in collaboration with software developer, Dynamic Benchmarking.
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
Getting Down and Dirty With PPE: Presentations at HSPA by Jill Holdsworth and Katie Belski
June 26th 2025In the heart of the hospital, decontamination technicians tackle one of health care’s dirtiest—and most vital—jobs. At HSPA 2025, 6 packed workshops led by experts Jill Holdsworth and Katie Belski spotlighted the crucial, often-overlooked art of PPE removal. The message was clear: proper doffing saves lives, starting with your own.
Unmasking Vaccine Myths: Dr Marschall Runge on Measles, Misinformation, and Public Health Solutions
May 29th 2025As measles cases climb across the US, discredited myths continue to undercut public trust in vaccines. In an exclusive interview with Infection Control Today, Michigan Medicine’s Marschall Runge, PhD, confronts misinformation head-on and explores how clinicians can counter it with science, empathy, and community engagement.
Silent Saboteurs: Managing Endotoxins for Sepsis-Free Sterilization
Invisible yet deadly, endotoxins evade traditional sterilization methods, posing significant risks during routine surgeries. Understanding and addressing their threat is critical for patient safety.