The American Cleaning Institute (ACI, formerly known as the Soap and Detergent Association) asserts that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should summarily reject a petition by activist groups to ban an important antibacterial chemical, as the petition is deficient, lacks merit and uniformly fails to provide relevant evidence.
In formal comments to the EPA, ACI noted that triclosan is a germ-killing ingredient in personal care and hand hygiene products, which are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, not the EPA.
"These products play a beneficial role in the daily hygiene routines of millions of people throughout the U.S. and worldwide," wrote Richard Sedlak, ACI's senior vice president of technical and international affairs. "They have been and are used safely and effectively in homes, hospitals, and workplaces every single day. Furthermore, triclosan and products containing it are regulated by a number of governmental bodies around the world and have a long track record of human and environmental safety which is supported by a multitude of scientifically based transparent risk analyses."
ACI says it took exception to the activist groups request for EPA to ban triclosan, stating that the EPA completed a very thorough review of the ingredient in a 2008 regulatory decision that formally re-registered triclosan for its use in EPA-regulated products. The petitioners attacks on triclosans safety and effectiveness rely on scientific bias, fail to present new relevant research that could impact EPAs findings, and appear to rely on an uninformed view of the established EPA re-registration process, according to ACI.
The ACI's comments summarize science-based research and data that show triclosan is safe for use in regulated hygiene products, does not cause significant risks or harm to human health and the environment, and does not contribute to bacterial resistance.
"In real-world situations such as the home, food manufacturing, and industrial environments, there is no evidence that antimicrobials can select for antibiotic resistant bacteria," wrote Sedlak.
ACI reiterated that triclosan-containing antibacterial handwash products provide a benefit compared to non-antibacterial hand wash products. "Antibacterial handwashes provide a public health benefit by reducing or eliminating pathogenic bacteria on the skin to a significantly greater degree than plain soap and water. The bacterial reduction from handwashing is linked to reduced infection from pathogenic bacteria."
Happy Hand Hygiene Day! Rethinking Glove Use for Safer, Cleaner, and More Ethical Health Care
May 5th 2025Despite their protective role, gloves are often misused in health care settings—undermining hand hygiene, risking patient safety, and worsening environmental impact. Alexandra Peters, PhD, points out that this misuse deserves urgent attention, especially today, World Hand Hygiene Day.
The Guardians of Animal Health: Who Are Veterinary Infection Preventionists?
March 21st 2025Veterinary infection control experts Leslie Kollmann, BS, AAS, CVT, CIC, Denise Waiting, LVT, and Leslie Landis, LVT, BS, discuss challenges, zoonotic disease risks, and the importance of education, collaboration, and resource development in animal care facilities.
The Latest on CLABSIs and CAUTIs: Evidence-Based Approaches for Infection Prevention
February 27th 2025Health care–associated infections like CLABSIs and CAUTIs threaten patient safety. Learn evidence-based strategies, new technologies, and prevention protocols to reduce these infections and improve outcomes.