After Ebola, Understanding Healthcare Needs Among Rural Liberians
As Liberia rebuilds a healthcare system decimated by the 2014 Ebola outbreak, understanding precisely how far citizens live from health facilities and its impact on seeking care can help shape new strategies to improve healthcare delivery and reduce geographic disparities.
A new examination of remoteness as a barrier to healthcare, published online today in the Journal of Global Health, notes that most surveys and policy documents categorize families as living either in an urban or rural setting, and this dichotomy can mask disparities of the most remote families.
"It's no surprise that those who live in rural areas are less likely to seek essential care from a healthcare facility, but for those at the farthest distances the disparity in maternal and child services is staggering," says John Kraemer, JD, MPH, assistant professor in the health systems administration department at Georgetown University School of Nursing & Health Studies. "Our study illuminates new opportunities for the health system to close this gap."
Kraemer and his colleagues, including members of Last Mile Health, an organization focused on health in rural Liberia, suggest a number of strategies to better serve those in the most rural settings. These include shifting care to the lowest level provider possible; community health worker-based service delivery; training, formalization, or partnership with traditional or informal providers; mobile clinics and clinical outreach; or reimbursing families for healthcare seeking and/or transportation costs.
"It is critical that international partners continue supporting Liberia's government after headlines about Ebola fade, and that rural health systems be rebuilt," says Kraemer, also a Scholar with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown Law. "International human rights law and ethical norms oblige health ministries and their development partners to promote equal access to essential health services."
In addition to Kraemer, study authors include Avi Kenny, Gaurab Basu, Madeleine Ballard, Thomas Griffiths, Katherine Kentoffio, Jean Bosco Niyonzima, G. Andrew Sechler, Stephen Selinsky, Rajesh R. Panjabi and Mark J. Siedner.
Source: Georgetown University Medical Center
Beyond the Surface: Rethinking Environmental Hygiene Validation at Exchange25
June 30th 2025Environmental hygiene is about more than just shiny surfaces. At Exchange25, infection prevention experts urged the field to look deeper, rethink blame, and validate cleaning efforts across the entire care environment, not just EVS tasks.
A Controversial Reboot: New Vaccine Panel Faces Scrutiny, Support, and Sharp Divides
June 26th 2025As the newly appointed Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met for the first time under sweeping changes by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the national spotlight turned to the panel’s legitimacy, vaccine guidance, and whether science or ideology would steer public health policy in a polarized era.
Getting Down and Dirty With PPE: Presentations at HSPA by Jill Holdsworth and Katie Belski
June 26th 2025In the heart of the hospital, decontamination technicians tackle one of health care’s dirtiest—and most vital—jobs. At HSPA 2025, 6 packed workshops led by experts Jill Holdsworth and Katie Belski spotlighted the crucial, often-overlooked art of PPE removal. The message was clear: proper doffing saves lives, starting with your own.
