|Articles|June 21, 2011

Control Measures Helped Prevent Spread of CRKP

Matan J. Cohen, MD, MPH, of the Center for Clinical Quality and Safety at Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center in Jerusalem, and colleagues, report in the latest issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology that patient cohorting, supplemented by widespread patient surveillance culturing, played a pivotal role in controlling the epidemic spread of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP).

  Through consecutive intervention analyses of all patients admitted to a 775-bed tertiary care medical center in Jerusalem from 2006 through 2010, the researchers assessed the effects of four interventions: a policy of isolation for patients colonized or infected with CRKP in single rooms; cohorting of CRKP patients with dedicated nursing staff and screening of patients neighboring a patient newly identified as a carrier of CRKP; weekly active surveillance of intensive care unit patients; and selective surveillance of patients admitted to the emergency department. Interrupted regression analysis and change-point analysis were used to assess the effect of each intervention on the CRKP epidemic.

Cohen, et al. report that on its own, patient isolation failed to control the spread of CRKP, with incidence increasing to a peak of 30 new cases per 1,000 hospital beds per month. They add that the institution of patient cohorting led to a steep decline in the incidence of CRKP acquisition, and that introduction of active surveillance interventions was followed by a decrease in the incidence of CRKP-positive clinical cultures but an increase in the incidence of CRKP-positive screening cultures. The mean prevalence of CRKP positivity for the period after cohorting began showed a statistically significant change from the mean prevalence in the preceding period.

Reference: Cohen MJ, Block C, Levin PD, Schwartz C, Gross I, Weiss Y, Moses AE and Benenson S. Institutional Control Measures to Curtail the Epidemic Spread of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A 4-Year Perspective. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiol. Vol. 32, No. 7. July 2011.  

 

 


Related to this article

Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Health care workers from the US speaking with other health care workers in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Is the Ebola outbreak in the DRC getting better? The answer depends on which numbers you examine. Several important indicators are moving in the right direction, including slower case growth and a declining Rₜ. But major gaps remain in contact tracing, testing, community deaths, safe burial coverage, and treatment capacity in some of the hardest-hit areas. ICT takes a deeper look at the latest outbreak data and why the numbers suggest cautious optimism, not victory.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.