BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- Vaxin Inc., a privately-held biotechnology company, has demonstrated, in a Phase I human clinical study, that the companys recombinant influenza vaccine provides a potential alternative to traditional flu vaccines. Published in the January 11, 2005 issue of the journal Vaccine (volume 23, issue 8, pages 1029-1036), the paper is entitled Safety and immunogenicity of adenovirus-vectored nasal and epicutaneous influenza vaccines in humans. The authors conclude that Vaxins novel flu vaccine, which is produced in cell culture, was immunogenic and well tolerated by human volunteers.
To our knowledge, this represents the first report of a recombinant influenza vaccine using a non-replicating adenovirus vector delivered either nasally or epicutaneously (to the surface of the skin), said De-chu C. Tang, PhD, corresponding author and vice president and chief technical officer of Vaxin.
The study was designed to determine whether humans can be immunized by a recombinant influenza vaccine, using the hemagglutinin (HA) gene from the PR8 (H1N1) influenza strain, contained within a non-replicating adenovirus vector. There were 24 study participants (healthy adults, age 20 to 31), in four groups. Groups 1, 2 and 3 received increasing doses delivered to the skin, respectively. Group 4 received the dose intra-nasally.
At a dose approximately 1000-fold lower (108 vs. 1011 virus particles) the nasal vaccine elicited a stronger immune response as compared to the vaccine delivered to the skin. Sixty-seven percent of the nasal vaccine recipients developed a four-fold antibody rise after one dose, which increased to 83 percent after a second dose. Immune response is a function of serum antibody level, and a four-fold or better rise in serum antibody level is considered protective.
There was no correlation between pre-existing levels of antibody to adenovirus, and the ability to achieve a four-fold rise in antibody to the influenza antigen. This finding indicates that the recombinant influenza vaccine may not be affected by pre-existing antibodies to the adenovirus vector when delivery is intranasal.
We are very pleased to report these encouraging findings from our proof-of-principle human clinical trial, commented Frank Cano, PhD, chairman and chief executive officer of Vaxin. These results are impressive given the low dose administered to the nose, especially since the PR8 strain is known to be inherently poorly immunogenic. The results support further study of intranasal administration, using increased dose levels and other influenza strains.
Furthermore, we believe our nasal vaccine will be at least as protective as the existing licensed influenza vaccines, and will be appropriate for children, adults and the elderly. Our clinical plans were discussed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last fall and we are now planning for an expanded Phase I monovalent study this year, followed by a trivalent study, Cano concluded.
The manufacturing method being used by Vaxin for its influenza vaccine has several important advantages. Currently, all FDA-approved flu vaccines are produced in chicken eggs. Vaxin, however, produces its vaccine in cell culture. Among the many benefits to this manufacturing process is that the product availability is not dependent on the long lead times required to secure chicken eggs every year, which may be important especially in the event of a pandemic. Cells for manufacturing Vaxins vaccine are stored in the freezer and are available the moment that manufacturing is required. In addition, the use of cell culture manufacturing eliminates the possibility of contamination with the avian flu virus, a risk inherent in egg-based production.
Furthermore, the Vaxin process provides higher yields, greater quantities in a faster timeframe, and more reliable manufacturing than the egg-based process. Also, the Vaxin manufacturing process is not dependent on how well (if at all) a particular strain grows in eggs. Finally, because the Vaxin process does not need to be adapted to grow in eggs to achieve higher yields, the Vaxin vaccine is truer to the strains picked by the regulatory agencies.
Source: Vaxin, Inc.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.
CDC Urges Vigilance: New Recommendations for Monitoring and Testing H5N1 Exposures
July 11th 2025With avian influenza A(H5N1) infections surfacing in both animals and humans, the CDC has issued updated guidance calling for aggressive monitoring and targeted testing to contain the virus and protect public health.
IP LifeLine: Layoffs and the Evolving Job Market Landscape for Infection Preventionists
July 11th 2025Infection preventionists, once hailed as indispensable during the pandemic, now face a sobering reality: budget pressures, hiring freezes, and layoffs are reshaping the field, leaving many IPs worried about their future and questioning their value within health care organizations.