Multimodal interventions are effective in increasing hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers, but it is not known whether such interventions are cost-effective outside high-income countries. Luangasanati, et al. (2015) sought to determine whether reductions in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSA-BSI) alone would make hand hygiene interventions cost-effective in intensive care units (ICUs) in a middle-income country using a model-based framework.
Transmission dynamic and decision analytic models were combined to determine the expected impact of hand hygiene interventions on MRSA-BSI incidence and evaluate their cost-effectiveness. Epidemiological and economic parameters were derived using data from a tertiary hospital in northeast Thailand. Sensitivity analyses were performed with different values for MRSA transmissibility and colonization prevalence on admission.
Interventions increasing hand hygiene compliance from a 10 percent baseline to ≥20 percent are likely to be cost-effective solely through reduced MRSA-BSI. Increasing compliance from 10 percent to 40 percent was estimated to cost $89 per bed-year with 4·07 QALYs gained per 10,000 bed-days in the pediatric ICU (PICU) and $63 per bed-year with 4·03 QALYs gained per 10,000 bed-days in the adult ICU. If baseline compliance is not greater than 20 percent, the intervention is always cost-effective even with only a 10 percent compliance improvement.
The researchers conclude that effective multimodal hand hygiene interventions are likely to be cost-effective in ICU settings in typical middle-income countries where baseline compliance is low due to preventing MRSA-BSI alone. Where compliance is higher, the cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve it further will depend on the impact on HAIs other than MRSA-BSI.
This paper is part of the supplement Abstracts from the 3rd International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control (ICPIC 2015).
Reference: Luangasanatip N, Hongsuwan M, Lubell Y, Limmathurotsakul D, Srisamang P, Day NPJ, Graves N and Cooper BS. Cost-effectiveness of hand hygiene promotion for MRSA bloodstream infection in ICU settings. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Volume 4 Suppl 1.
Happy Hand Hygiene Day! Rethinking Glove Use for Safer, Cleaner, and More Ethical Health Care
May 5th 2025Despite their protective role, gloves are often misused in health care settings—undermining hand hygiene, risking patient safety, and worsening environmental impact. Alexandra Peters, PhD, points out that this misuse deserves urgent attention, especially today, World Hand Hygiene Day.
The Guardians of Animal Health: Who Are Veterinary Infection Preventionists?
March 21st 2025Veterinary infection control experts Leslie Kollmann, BS, AAS, CVT, CIC, Denise Waiting, LVT, and Leslie Landis, LVT, BS, discuss challenges, zoonotic disease risks, and the importance of education, collaboration, and resource development in animal care facilities.