|Articles|November 1, 2001

Glove Standards Keep Evolving

Glove Standards Keep Evolving

By Pamela Werner, RN, BSN, CNOR, MBA

Another day begins in the busy operating room of a large community hospital. Today more than 60 procedures will be completed requiring the use of gloves. Surgical gloves, both latex and nonlatex, will be required for the surgery personnel that will be scrubbed in. Examination gloves will be necessary for the anesthesia team, environmental services, and other OR personnel involved in direct patient care, and for the Central Sterile Processing personnel to clean and decontaminate the instruments used during the day. Each has a need for a glove that will stand up to the task at hand. According to recent IMS data, approximately 6.6 million units of gloves were used in the hospital setting in the last year.

Prior to the mandate of universal precautions in 1987, gloves attracted little attention from any regulatory agencies. That is no longer true in today's healthcare environment. And it's a wonder that healthcare workers (HCWs) are able to do the work of caring for patients when they are so overwhelmed with regulations. However, these very standards and regulations provide the assurances HCWs need to provide the very best care for their patients. The following is a brief summary of the two agencies, that have a direct influence on medical glove standards in the US.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Until 1976 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), by statute, only had the authority to regulate drugs. This changed with the May 28, 1976 introduction of the Medical Device Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FFD&C) Act. The FDA now regulates all medical devices. The FDA rules and regulations were established to assure the public of the safety, effectiveness, and proper use of all medical devices, including gloves.

The FDA does not actually write standards but it does recognize standards that are written by national and international standard-setting bodies, such as the American Association of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) and United States Pharmacopoeia (USP). Representatives from the FDA often sit on standard-writing committees. The FDA, in determining the acceptability of medical devices for the marketplace, will often use these established standards as baseline requirements. For example, the FDA requires all medical glove manufacturers to meet the requirements in ASTM D 5151 for detection of holes. In response to growing concerns among HCWs and industry experts, new research information, and the development of new barrier materials, there have been many standards developed by ASTM for medical gloves over the years. And the FDA requirements for market entry have changed accordingly.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)

ASTM is a not-for-profit organization that provides a forum for consumers, manufacturers, citizens, organizations, government representatives, and academia, to meet and write standards for variety of products, services, and materials. Gloves, both surgical and examination, manufactured from natural rubber latex (NRL) were some of the first products forwhich ASTM developed standards. The list of current ASTM standards that relate to gloves (see Table 1) provides standards for test methods that are applicable to all medical gloves as well as standards for specific types of medical gloves. The FDA recognizes the ASTM standards in Table 1 and they are listed in the US Federal Register. Glove manufacturers must conform to these consensus standards in order to meet the requirements set forth by the FDA for the particular type(s) of medical gloves that they market. Numerous companies, manufacturers, laboratories and agencies also use ASTM standards.

Once ASTM has developed a standard, the responsible committee may revise it at any time in response to an industry, consumer or regulatory need. Every five yearsthe standard must be reviewed, at that time it may be either re-approved or withdrawn. The public may submit comments to the committee by addressing their concerns to ASTM headquarters. The ASTM book of standards is published annually and approximately 30% of the standards are new or revised. The standards are organized in alphanumeric sequence by their ASTM number. Each standard has a fixed number, i.e., D3577, followed by the date the standard originated or the date of the last revision, i.e., 00. As ASTM standards evolve, manufacturers will respond, in kind, to provide the best barrier protection materials to meet the needs of the healthcare environment.

Pamela Werner, RN, BSN, CNOR, MBA, is a clinical and educational affairs manager with Ansell Healthcare.

Title of Standard
Performance Requirements
 
 
AQL for holes in Mpa
Minimum Unaged Tensile Strength
Minimum Unaged Elongation Percent
D 3577-00
Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves
1.5%
24 (3480 psi)
750
D 3578-00
Standard Specification for Rubber Examination Gloves
2.5%
14 (2030 psi)
700
D 5250-00
Standard Specification for Poly(vinyl chloride) Gloves for Medical Application
2.5%
9 (1305 psi)
300
D 6319-00
Standard Specification for Nitrile Examination Gloves for Medical Application
2.5%
12.5 (1813 psi)
500
D 5151-99
Standard Test Method for Detection of Holes in Medical Gloves
NA
NA
NA
D 6355-98
Standard Test Method for Human Repeat Insult Patch Testing of Medical Gloves
NA
NA
NA
D 6124-00
Standard Test Method for Residual Powder on Medical Gloves
NA
NA
NA
D 6499-00
Standard Test Methods for the Immunological Measurement of Antigenic Protein in Natural Rubber and its Products
NA
NA
NA


Related to this article

A brightly lit Hospital operating room, a surgical team wearing gowns and masks.  (Adobe Stock 1790696595 by Damian)
Turnover pressure can leave critical OR cleaning steps unfinished. Karen deKay, MSN, RN, EBP-C, CNOR, CIC, FAPIC, examines common gaps in environmental hygiene and how shared responsibilities, attention to disinfectant contact time, and ongoing education can help teams strengthen practices between cases.
Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.