HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today released the first in a series of healthcare “success story” reports that document innovative programs and initiatives that can serve as models for a reformed American healthcare system. The inaugural report highlights the Michigan Keystone ICU Project. A joint partnership between the Michigan Health & Hospital Association and the Johns Hopkins University, the Michigan Keystone ICU Project helped dramatically reduce the number of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in Michigan, saving over 1,500 lives and $200 million.
“We know there are tremendous examples of efficient, high-quality healthcare in America today. Our challenge is spreading these good examples across the country,” said Sebelius. “Our reports will showcase success stories like the Michigan Keystone ICU Project and highlight how health reform can improve the quality of care for all Americans.”
Medical errors including healthcare-associated infections claim the lives of nearly 100,000 patients in America every year and patient safety measures have worsened by nearly 1 percent each year for the past decade. The Michigan Keystone ICU Project worked to make patient care safer in over 100 ICUs in the state of Michigan. The project targeted a specific type of infection that ICU patients can get while in the hospital: catheter-related bloodstream infections. To help reduce these infections, the project worked to ensure clinicians used a simple checklist when inserting catheters into ICU patients.
Following the checklist was associated with a 66 percent reduction in these infections throughout the state of Michigan, saving over 1,500 lives and $200 million in the first 18 months alone. This project was funded by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and for every dollar invested, approximately $200 was saved.
“Americans don’t expect to get additional infections when they go into the hospital,” said Sebelius. “Stopping healthcare-associated infections and improving the quality of care is one of our top priorities.”
The Obama Administration has already begun work to reduce healthcare-associated infections. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) included $50 million in grants available for states to help fight healthcare-associated infections across the country. Sebelius has also called on hospitals across America to commit to reduce Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections in Intensive Care Units by 75 percent over the next three years by using the same checklist that has shown such success in Michigan.
The President is also working to enact health reform that will emphasize quality care over quantity and makes healthcare more affordable for American families, businesses and the government.
“When we enact health reform, we can improve quality, help control costs and ensure success stories like the Michigan Keystone ICU Project become the rule, not the exception,” added Sebelius.
How Contaminated Is Your Stretcher? The Hidden Risks on Hospital Wheels
July 3rd 2025Despite routine disinfection, hospital surfaces, such as stretchers, remain reservoirs for harmful microbes, according to several recent studies. From high-touch areas to damaged mattresses and the effectiveness of antimicrobial coatings, researchers continue to uncover persistent risks in environmental hygiene, highlighting the critical need for innovative, continuous disinfection strategies in health care settings.
Beyond the Surface: Rethinking Environmental Hygiene Validation at Exchange25
June 30th 2025Environmental hygiene is about more than just shiny surfaces. At Exchange25, infection prevention experts urged the field to look deeper, rethink blame, and validate cleaning efforts across the entire care environment, not just EVS tasks.
A Controversial Reboot: New Vaccine Panel Faces Scrutiny, Support, and Sharp Divides
June 26th 2025As the newly appointed Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met for the first time under sweeping changes by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the national spotlight turned to the panel’s legitimacy, vaccine guidance, and whether science or ideology would steer public health policy in a polarized era.