News|Videos|May 19, 2025

Precision Matters: Why Proper Detergent Use Is Critical for Cleaning Complex Medical Devices

At the 2025 HSPA conference, experts emphasized the vital role of detergents and enzymatic cleaners in reprocessing medical devices—highlighting how temperature, concentration, and technique directly impact cleaning performance in today’s increasingly complex surgical instrumentation.

At the 2025 HSPA Annual Conference & Expo, Matthias Tschoerner, Dr Sc, Nat, head of Applications, Engineering, Research, & Development from a Hamburg-based chemical company, Chemische Fabrik Dr. Weigert GmbH & Co. KG, shared insights into the science and challenges of cleaning medical devices in sterile processing departments (SPDs).

The focus was on how detergents—especially those containing surfactants and enzymes—play a crucial role in removing contaminants like blood and proteins from surgical instruments. However, effective cleaning is not only about using the right chemicals; it also requires strict adherence to validated parameters, including temperature, time, concentration, and mechanical action.

“And the major challenge today is, I think, with the proceeding of the operations and techniques and forward instrumentation, the instruments become more and more complex, and this makes them very difficult to handle,” Tschoerner told Infection Control Today® (ICT®) during an interview at the conference, held from April 26 to 29 in Louisville, Kentucky,

One of the key points he raised was the delicate balance of temperature when using enzymatic cleaners. If the temperature is too low, cleaning performance drops. Too high, and enzymes can become inactivated, rendering the detergent ineffective. This highlights the critical role of SPD technicians, who must precisely follow instructions for use (IFUs) to ensure instruments are cleaned, disinfected, and sterilized safely.

Tschoerner emphasized the growing complexity of surgical instruments as a significant challenge. With advancements in medical procedures and equipment, instruments now have intricate designs that are harder to disassemble, clean, and reassemble. Every surface, both internal and external, must be meticulously cleaned before sterilization, making the SPD’s work foundational to patient safety.

Tschoerner concluded by praising the knowledge exchange at the conference, noting that learning from peers and sharing expertise is essential in advancing reprocessing practices. As instruments become more complex, continued education and collaboration will be key to maintaining effective and safe health care environments.


Related to this article

Sadé L. Rolon, MBA, CMIP, CHESP, T-CHEST, T-CSCT, the regional director of operations for Sodexo’s Healthcare Division,  Julie Mangino, MD, infectious disease specialist at The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH,  James “JJ” Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, the university director of buildings & grounds at UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut,  Christopher Dugard, MS, director for the Division of Infection Control Devices in the Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices, FDA/Center for Devices and Radiological Health.  and Elizabeth “Liz” Claverie, MS, (retired CAPT, 0-6) vice president, regulatory strategic liaison for Steris.  (Image credit: Author)
Can a UV-C robot make up for a surface that wasn't properly cleaned? Experts say that's the wrong way to think about the technology. UV-C can provide an additional layer of microbial reduction, but factors including shadows, distance, positioning, and exposure time mean it cannot replace thorough manual cleaning and disinfection.
Sadé L. Rolon, MBA, CMIP, CHESP, T-CHEST, T-CSCT, the regional director of operations for Sodexo’s Healthcare Division,  Julie Mangino, MD, infectious disease specialist at The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH,  James “JJ” Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, the university director of buildings & grounds at UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut,  Christopher Dugard, MS, director for the Division of Infection Control Devices in the Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices, FDA/Center for Devices and Radiological Health.  and Elizabeth “Liz” Claverie, MS, (retired CAPT, 0-6) vice president, regulatory strategic liaison for Steris.  (Image credit: Author)
During an expert panel at Exchange26 on whole-room microbial reduction technologies, regulatory and health care leaders discussed the distinction between FDA and EPA oversight, what constitutes a medical device claim, the risks surrounding unauthorized or off-label claims, and why IP and EVS professionals should verify a device's regulatory status rather than relying solely on vendor presentations.
Donald Sipp, Jr, MBA, RESE, CHESP, CHTI-2, CMIP, PMP, and David Green  (Image credit: author)
“Cutting” waste shouldn’t mean cutting people. At AHE Exchange26, David Green and Donald Sipp explored how EVS departments can improve performance by strengthening workplace culture, empowering employees, eliminating inefficient processes, and understanding EVS’s critical role in patient throughput. One case study showed bed turnaround times falling from nearly 2 hours to less than an hour, but the larger lesson wasn't simply about speed. High-performing EVS operations begin with a strong foundation.
A brightly lit Hospital operating room, a surgical team wearing gowns and masks.  (Adobe Stock 1790696595 by Damian)
Turnover pressure can leave critical OR cleaning steps unfinished. Karen deKay, MSN, RN, EBP-C, CNOR, CIC, FAPIC, examines common gaps in environmental hygiene and how shared responsibilities, attention to disinfectant contact time, and ongoing education can help teams strengthen practices between cases.