The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (JPIDS) has released the largest and most rigorous evaluation to date of the impact on reducing the days of antibiotic therapy in a childrens hospital using a prospective-audit-with-feedback antibiotic stewardship program (ASP). The study utilized a control group of the 25-member childrens hospitals of the Child Health Corporation of America. A companion article describes how the ASP was created within this 317-bed tertiary care childrens hospital and clinicians attitudes toward itthe first published account of such a pediatric program.
Up to 35 percent of inpatient antibiotic prescriptions are either unnecessary or inappropriate. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)'s 2007 guideline on the implementation of hospital ASPs described two core stewardship strategies to curb the rise of drug-resistant microbes: prospective-audit-with-feedback, and preauthorization. IDSA said that research would be needed to determine whether these strategies would be effective in pediatrics.
In this more-than-33-month study of 8,765 patients, Newland, et al., observed a significant decrease in antibiotic usageranging from a 37 percent decrease in the early months, to 13 percent at the end of the observation. In particular, the study showed up to a 19 percent monthly reduction in broad-spectrum antibiotics, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended avoiding in order to prevent resistance in hospitalized children.
In the companion article, Stach, et al., describe the five-part process they used to create their ASP, including: forming a multi-disciplinary team; determining the type of program (prospective-audit-with-feedback) and which antimicrobials to monitor; deciding which mechanism to use in identifying patients (a report was created in the hospitals EMR system); developing and implementing an evaluation process; and, communicating the goals and logistics of the ASP to the hospitals affected clinicians.
The authors surveyed 365 clinicians; the 56 percent who responded had a positive view of the ASP.  The overwhelming majority agreed that the ASP had improved the use (83 percent) of antibiotics, decreased their inappropriate use (84 percent), and improved the quality of patient care (82 percent). An ASP goal was to provide education to those affected by the program; 90 percent said it did and 66 percent agreed it led to practice changes. Of negative feelings, only 6 percent felt the ASP interfered with clinical decision-making and 5 percent thought the ASPs recommendations were threatening.
The quarterly Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (JPIDS) represents the spectrum of peer-reviewed, scientific and clinical information on perinatal, childhood and adolescent infectious diseases.
CDC Urges Vigilance: New Recommendations for Monitoring and Testing H5N1 Exposures
July 11th 2025With avian influenza A(H5N1) infections surfacing in both animals and humans, the CDC has issued updated guidance calling for aggressive monitoring and targeted testing to contain the virus and protect public health.
IP LifeLine: Layoffs and the Evolving Job Market Landscape for Infection Preventionists
July 11th 2025Infection preventionists, once hailed as indispensable during the pandemic, now face a sobering reality: budget pressures, hiring freezes, and layoffs are reshaping the field, leaving many IPs worried about their future and questioning their value within health care organizations.
A Helping Hand: Innovative Approaches to Expanding Hand Hygiene Programs in Acute Care Settings
July 9th 2025Who knew candy, UV lights, and a college kid in scrubs could double hand hygiene adherence? A Pennsylvania hospital’s creative shake-up of its infection prevention program shows that sometimes it takes more than soap to get hands clean—and keep them that way.