Somali-Americans develop twice the antibody response to rubella from the current vaccine compared to Caucasians in a new Mayo Clinic study on individualized aspects of immune response. A non-Somali, African-American cohort ranked next in immune response, still significantly higher than Caucasians, and Hispanic Americans in the study were least responsive to the vaccine. The findings appear in the journal Vaccine.
Â
 This is fascinating, says Gregory Poland, MD, Mayo Clinic vaccinologist and senior author of the study. We dont know why these groups reacted so differently to the vaccine thats a subject for further studies but this new information will help us as we design the vaccines of the future. It will ultimately change how we practice medicine.
The researchers studied a sample of 1,100 healthy children and young adults in Rochester, as well as over 1,000 participants from the U.S. Naval Health Research Center in San Diego as the control group. The Navy members, aged 18 to 40, were all healthy and recently vaccinated, and represented a cross-section of ethnic groups. The study also looked at a subset of a recent immigrant population from Somalia in Rochester. The Minnesota case studies were done in cooperation with the Rochester Epidemiology Project.
Â
The researchers hypothesized that race, sex or ethnicity might contribute to differences in immune response. They found no difference in gendera surprise, says Poland, because in most studies women consistently have a better immune response to vaccines than men.
Â
The significance of the findings is that in the future we may be able to create vaccines for specific groups or even individuals based on their genomic and other characteristics, says Poland. That may mean adjusting doses for some or being able to treat larger populations with the same vaccine if the dosage is less.
Â
The research team includes first author Iana Haralambieva, MD, PhD, Hannah Salk, Nathaniel Lambert, PhD, Inna Ovsyannikova, PhD, Richard Kennedy, Ph.D., Nathaniel Warner, and V. Shane Pankratz, PhD, all of Mayo Clinic.
Â
The research was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-National Institutes of Health, and by Mayo Clinic.
 Â
Source: Mayo Clinic
The Key to Sterile Processing Success: Leadership Engagement and Team Collaboration
January 24th 2025Effective sterile processing leadership requires active engagement, clear communication, and a transformational approach to foster collaboration, accountability, and quality in infection prevention and surgical instrument management.
Evaluating Automated Dispensing Systems for Disinfectants in Hospitals
January 23rd 2025Hospitals rely on automated disinfectant dispensers, but a study led by Curtis Donskey, MD, found inconsistent dilution levels, with some dispensers releasing only water. Improved monitoring and design modifications are essential.
Alcohol-Based Antiseptics Show Promise for Nasal Decolonization and SSI Prevention
January 23rd 2025A meta-analysis found alcohol-based antiseptics significantly reduce Staphylococcus aureus-related surgical site infections (SSIs), demonstrating efficacy comparable to mupirocin and iodophor, supporting their expanded use in infection prevention strategies.
ASRA Pain Medicine Releases Groundbreaking Infection Control Guidelines for Pain Management
January 22nd 2025The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA Pain Medicine) released comprehensive infection control guidelines for pain procedures, emphasizing prevention, early recognition, multidisciplinary collaboration, and judicious antibiotic use to enhance patient safety and healthcare outcomes.