|Articles|September 29, 2010

New Mask Study Supports CDC's Updated Guidance for Seasonal Flu Prevention Strategies

Crosstex International, a subsidiary of Cantel Medical Corp., announces today the publication of sponsored research that suggests a far greater infection prevention value of medical face masks, commonly referred to as surgical masks, than previously understood.

 

The key outcome challenges conventional wisdom that a medical mask or respirator is most effective when worn by a person attempting to protect oneself from exposure to infectious matter. Instead, if FDA-cleared medical face masks are worn at the potential source of the infection, the level of overall protection is magnified up to 300-fold.

 

Published in the September issue of the American Journal of Infection Control, the research study, "Quantifying Exposure Risk and Mask Protection," was conducted by Keith Diaz, MD, and Gerald Smaldone, MD, PhD, at Stony Brook University Medical Center in Stony Brook, N.Y.

This study supports the newest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guidelines on Seasonal Influenza Prevention Strategies in Healthcare Settings, which recommend the use of medical face masks to minimize potential exposure to influenza viruses in healthcare settings. The simulated bench study examined the efficacy of N95 respirators and medical face masks in their ability to reduce exposure to infectious particles when used either as protective devices (to protect the wearer) or as "source control" devices (to control infection at the source, such as a person with flu-like symptoms). The authors' results demonstrate "the most important factor in reducing exposure was deflection of exhaled particles at the source." 

"This evidence offers healthcare providers and public health officials new insight into the benefit of medical face masks as source control devices," says Gary Steinberg, CEO of Crosstex International.  "It was clear that medical face masks were being narrowly compared to N95 respirators for their ability to protect the wearer from the outside-in," says Matt Conlon, vice president at Cantel Medical.  We wanted to better understand the value of medical face masks for source control, that is, protecting others from the inside-out."

 

While medical face masks are commonly referred to as personal protective equipment (PPE), their original purpose was to protect the patient from acquiring an infection from the healthcare worker. This new research is the first to quantify their important role in controlling the infection at the source and further demonstrated that a tighter fitting medical mask performs best in source control.  

The findings come in the wake of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic when there were significant complications, shortages, and debate surrounding the CDC's formal recommendation for the use of N95's by healthcare workers for protection against the H1N1 virus.

 

"This shows an exponential infection control benefit at a fraction of the cost and complexity of using N95 respirators," Steinberg says. "As one of the few remaining U.S. manufacturers of medical masks, it is important for Crosstex to continue funding this type of independent research to address infectious disease threats through continued mask innovation. We don't overlook the fact that masks are medical devices. We understand they can save lives and dramatically reduce costs associated with respiratory-borne infections."

 

 

 


Related to this article

Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Health care workers from the US speaking with other health care workers in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Is the Ebola outbreak in the DRC getting better? The answer depends on which numbers you examine. Several important indicators are moving in the right direction, including slower case growth and a declining Rₜ. But major gaps remain in contact tracing, testing, community deaths, safe burial coverage, and treatment capacity in some of the hardest-hit areas. ICT takes a deeper look at the latest outbreak data and why the numbers suggest cautious optimism, not victory.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.