Prevention: Bigger needles for better vaccinations

Article

New York Times

To a patient, few things look bigger than that needle a doctor is about to plunge who-knows-where to administer a vaccine.

But some doctors are arguing that in many cases, those syringes ought to be even bigger.

Writing in a recent issue of The British Medical Journal, the doctors said that for some people, especially overweight ones, the needles were simply too small to be effective.

They cited a recent study of 220 adults that found that the standard needle (which they said was five-eighths of an inch long) could not penetrate the upper arms of 17 percent of the men and 50 percent of the women because of variations in the thickness of fat.

For men weighing 130 to 260 pounds, and for women weighing 132 to 198 pounds, it may be better to use a one-inch needle, the researchers said. And for women above 198 pounds, they said, a one-and-a-half inch needle may be in order.

"It is essential that vaccines reach the muscle to ensure that the body's immune response is triggered and to reduce the likelihood of an adverse reaction," the journal said.

Recent Videos
Pathogen Playbook Presenter: Sharon Ward-Fore, BS, MS, MT(ASCP), CIC, FAPIC
Mark Wiencek, PhD
Rebecca Crapanzano-Sigafoos, DrPH, CIC, AL-CIP, FAPIC
The CDC’s updated hospital respiratory reporting requirement has added new layers of responsibility for infection preventionists. Karen Jones, MPH, RN, CIC, FAPIC, clinical program manager at Wolters Kluwer, breaks down what it means and how IPs can adapt.
Studying for the CIC using a digital tablet and computer (Adobe Stock 335828989 by NIKCOA)
Infection Control Today's Conversations with the HSPA President, Arlene Bush, CRCST, CER, CIS, SME, DSMD, CRMST
Infection Control Today's Conversations with the HSPA President, Arlene Bush, CRCST, CER, CIS, SME, DSMD, CRMST
Cheron Rojo, BS, FCS, CHL,  CER, CFER, CRCST
Matthias Tschoerner, Dr Sc
Standardizing Cleaning and Disinfection
Related Content