Transmission of healthcare-acquired infections (HAI) depends mainly on contacts between patients, between healthcare workers (HCWs) and between patients and HCWs. The objective of this study by Payet, et al. was to combine contacts data and virological data for studying influenza transmission during an outbreak occurring in a hospital unit.
Face-to-face proximity between persons was collected during 10 consecutive days using electronic RFID badges. Virological data on influenza infection status were also collected. Each patient and each HCW had two nasal swabs, one at admission and one at discharge for patients, and two swabs at seven days interval for HCWs, from which laboratory confirmation of influenza infection was performed.
A total of 18,766 contacts were recorded among 37 patients and 47 HCWs. Nurses, medical doctors and patients were involved in 82 percent, 26 percent and 24 percent of all the contacts respectively. In parallel, during the 10 days, an outbreak occurred involving 15 laboratory-confirmed influenza cases diagnosed among 10 patients (attack rate 27 percent) and five HCWs (attack rate 10 percent).
The researchers identified five (14 percent) patients and 10 (20 percent) HCWs who accumulated nearly 50 percent of all the contacts involving patients and HCWs. Among these persons with a high number of contacts, three (60 percent) patients and one (10 percent) HCW had confirmed influenza. Among those with a lower number of contacts, seven (22 percent) patients and four (11 percent) HCWs had confirmed influenza. Further statistical analyses are ongoing to assess the relationship between the number and duration of contacts and the risk of influenza transmission.
Collecting contacts data in the hospital setting and combining this information with virological data could be an interesting approach to study the transmission of HAIs. The researchers identified patients and HCWs with a high number of contacts, who could be considered as potential super-spreaders of infections. This is key information that may help to implement prevention and control measures.
Reference:Â Payet C, Barrat A, et al. Oral abstract O023 presented at ICPIC 2013: Combining electronic contacts data and virological data for studying the transmission of infections at hospital. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2013, 2(Suppl 1):O23.
I Was There: An Infection Preventionist on the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 30th 2025Deep feelings run strong about the COVID-19 pandemic, and some beautiful art has come out of those emotions. Infection Control Today is proud to share this poem by Carmen Duke, MPH, CIC, in response to a recent article by Heather Stoltzfus, MPH, RN, CIC.
From the Derby to the Decontam Room: Leadership Lessons for Sterile Processing
April 27th 2025Elizabeth (Betty) Casey, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRCST, CHL, is the SVP of Operations and Chief Nursing Officer at Surgical Solutions in Overland, Kansas. This SPD leader reframes preparation, unpredictability, and teamwork by comparing surgical services to the Kentucky Derby to reenergize sterile processing professionals and inspire systemic change.
Show, Tell, Teach: Elevating EVS Training Through Cognitive Science and Performance Coaching
April 25th 2025Training EVS workers for hygiene excellence demands more than manuals—it requires active engagement, motor skills coaching, and teach-back techniques to reduce HAIs and improve patient outcomes.