The use of examination gloves is part of the standard precautions to prevent medical staff from transmission of infectious agents between patients. Gloves also protect the staff from infectious agents originating from patients. Adequate protection, however, depends on intact gloves. The risk of perforation of examination gloves is thought to correlate with duration of wearing, yet only a few prospective studies have been performed on this issue. Hübner, et al. (2013) collected a total of 1,500 consecutively used pairs of examination gloves of two different brands and materials (latex and nitrile) over a period of two months on two ICUs. Used gloves were examined for micro-perforations using the "waterproof test" according to EN 455-1. Cox-regression for both glove types was used to estimate optimal changing intervals.
Â
Only 26 percent of gloves were worn longer than 15 minutes. The total perforation rate was 10.3 percent with significant differences and deterioration of integrity of gloves between brands (p<0.001). Apart from the brand, change of wound dressing (p = 0.049) and washing patients (p = 0.001) were also significantly associated with an increased risk of perforation.
Â
The researchers concluded that medical gloves show marked differences in their durability that cannot be predicted based on the technical data routinely provided by the manufacturer. They add that based on the increase of micro-perforations over time and the wearing behavior, recommendations for maximum wearing time of gloves should be given. Hübner, et al. (2013) say that changing of gloves after 15 minutes could be a good compromise between feasibility and safety, and that healthcare workers should be aware of the benefits and limitations of medical gloves. To improve personal hygiene hand disinfection should be further encouraged. Their research was published in BMC Infectious Diseases.
Reference: Hübner NO, Goerdt AM, Mannerow A, Pohrt U, Heidecke CD, Kramer A and Partecke LI. The durability of examination gloves used on intensive care units. BMC Infectious Diseases 2013, 13:226 doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-226
Ensuring Safety and Comfort: The Urgent Need for Well-Fitted PPE in Health Care
April 5th 2024Personal protective equipment (PPE) stands as the first line of defense against infectious diseases in health care. Yet, the issue of ill-fitting PPE, especially for women, remains a significant challenge.
COVID-19 Harmonization: Balancing Risks and Benefits of CDC's Latest Move
March 11th 2024The CDC's recent decision to align recommendations for respiratory viruses, particularly COVID-19, has garnered support from the public and infectious disease societies. However, as the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) lends its backing to the CDC's harmonization efforts, concerns persist regarding the implications of this shift, especially considering the Omicron variant's unique characteristics and the ongoing challenges posed by COVID-19's multi-system impacts.
Voices of Resilience: Q&A With the Editor of "Corona City: Voices From an Epicenter"
March 1st 2024Step into the diverse and poignant world of "Corona City: Voices From an Epicenter" with editor Lorraine Ash, MA. In this insightful Q&A, learn about the origins of this remarkable anthology, the challenges faced in capturing raw, unfiltered narratives of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the lasting impact of these stories on readers and communities alike.
Rare Disease Day 2024: Spotlight on Rare Infectious Diseases
February 29th 2024Rare Disease Day on February 29, 2024, shines a global light on the impact of rare diseases, including rare infectious diseases. With a focus on early diagnosis and treatment access, this day highlights the struggles of those with rare conditions.