If your USP <797> environmental monitoring program only identifies problems after an excursion, are you really in control? Rhonda Lintner outlines 3 levels of maturity: compliance, data trending, and genus-level identification.
Rhonda Lintner, MPH
Advertisement
Rhonda Lintner, MPH, is a seasoned expert in environmental monitoring and quality compliance, with over 2 decades of experience in controlled environments and sterile compounding in health care settings. She specializes in consulting on cleanroom process design, construction oversight, and commissioning, including installation qualification (IQ), operational qualification (OQ), and performance qualification (PQ).
Lintner’s expertise extends to USP <797> and <800> compliance, as well as FDA-regulated sterile device manufacturing, making her a trusted advisor in ensuring facilities meet stringent federal and regulatory standards. As an Account Executive with Pace Analytical Laboratories Building Sciences, she provides specialized guidance on microbial bioburden management, environmental monitoring, and engineering controls for health care facilities and research laboratories.
Articles by Rhonda Lintner, MPH
Advertisement
Latest Updated Articles
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Infection Control Today
1
The New Rules of Recertification: What CBIC’s Industry IPU Policy Means for You
2
Bat in the Hospital: The Rabies Scenario Every Infection Preventionist Should Be Ready For.
3
Protecting the Integrity of the Credential: What the IPU Standard Does — and Does Not — Change
4
Same Expert, Different Employer: Should That Change What Counts as IPC Education?
5