|Articles|September 29, 2003

Aventis and NIH Enter Into SARS Vaccine R&D Pact

LYON, FRANCE -- Aventis has entered into an agreement with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), to research and develop an inactivated virus vaccine against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Aventis Pasteur, the human vaccines business of Aventis, has agreed to develop a candidate vaccine using a similar approach to that of the currently licensed inactivated polio vaccine. The agreement was signed on Sept. 26, 2003.

"This is important research that could have an impact on public health throughout the world. We hope to be able to advance development of a SARS vaccine by putting to work the knowledge that Aventis Pasteur scientists have amassed in designing inactivated vaccines and the company's expertise in bringing them to market," said David J. Williams, chairman and chief executive officer of Aventis Pasteur. Williams said that the project will be an important initiative within the company's research agenda. However, he cautioned that it would be important to have realistic expectations on timelines.

"Even with our extensive experience in this area and an ambitious development timeline, it will likely take approximately two years before any candidate vaccine moves into clinical trials," he said.

The research will take place in company research and development facilities in France that have the necessary level of biological safety with contributions from Aventis Pasteur scientists in the U.S. and Canada.

This is the third significant activity against SARS undertaken by the company. Earlier this year, Aventis Pasteur donated its proprietary Vero Cell culture line to NIAID and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to speed up research. Aventis Pasteur is also participating in the Canadian SARS Research Consortium, a public-private effort to coordinate, promote and support research on SARS, including vaccine development.

Source: Aventis


Related to this article

Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Health care workers from the US speaking with other health care workers in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Is the Ebola outbreak in the DRC getting better? The answer depends on which numbers you examine. Several important indicators are moving in the right direction, including slower case growth and a declining Rₜ. But major gaps remain in contact tracing, testing, community deaths, safe burial coverage, and treatment capacity in some of the hardest-hit areas. ICT takes a deeper look at the latest outbreak data and why the numbers suggest cautious optimism, not victory.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.