|Articles|April 30, 2003

CDC Updates Interim U.S. Surveillance Case Definition for SARS

ATLANTA -- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has added laboratory criteria for evidence of infection with the SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) to its interim surveillance case definition. CDC Director Dr. Julie L. Gerberding announced a new category, laboratory-confirmed, at a Senate committee hearing on SARS on Tuesday.

A total of 274 cases of SARS have been reported in the United States; 222 are suspect cases and 52 are probable. Of the 52 probable SARS cases reported as of April 29, 2003, 6 are laboratory-confirmed using the new laboratory criteria. Twelve cases are considered probable, but are not laboratory-confirmed, either because the laboratory tests are not sensitive enough to pick up the SARS virus or because the illness was not caused by SARS virus. Laboratory results are undetermined for the remaining 34 probable cases; for some, testing is in progress and for others suitable specimens are not available for testing.

Using the new laboratory criteria, a SARS case is laboratory-confirmed if one of the following is met:

· Detection of antibody to SARS-CoV by indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

· Isolation of SARS-CoV in tissue culture

· Detection of SARS-CoV RNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which must be confirmed by a second PCR test

Negative laboratory results for PCR, viral culture, or antibody tests obtained within 21 days of illness do not rule out coronavirus infection. In these cases, an antibody test of a specimen obtained more than 21 days after illness begins is needed to determine infection.

Most U.S. cases of SARS continue to be associated with travel; a small number of cases have resulted from secondary spread to household members or healthcare workers. CDC will continue to update the SARS case definition as new data become available, or if there are changes in the spread of SARS illness in the United States.

Source: CDC


Related to this article

Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Health care workers from the US speaking with other health care workers in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Is the Ebola outbreak in the DRC getting better? The answer depends on which numbers you examine. Several important indicators are moving in the right direction, including slower case growth and a declining Rₜ. But major gaps remain in contact tracing, testing, community deaths, safe burial coverage, and treatment capacity in some of the hardest-hit areas. ICT takes a deeper look at the latest outbreak data and why the numbers suggest cautious optimism, not victory.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.