The use of four different 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine immunization schedules in healthy-term infants resulted in no statistically significant differences in antibody levels between the infants after the booster dose at 12 months of age for almost all serotypes, according to a study in the Sept. 4 issue of JAMA.
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that more than 800,000 children younger than 5 years died from pneumococcal disease in 2000, making it the leading vaccine-preventable cause of death. Since the licensure in 2000 of the first 7-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PCV) for infants, many countries have added PCV to their existing national immunization programs. As a result, PCV immunization schedules differ between countries with respect to number of doses, age at vaccinations, and intervals between doses, according to background information in the article. The optimal vaccine schedule for infants should provide maximal, sustained direct and indirect protection against invasive pneumococcal disease while using a minimal number of doses. The latter is particularly relevant in the context of overcrowded national immunization programs, public resistance to vaccines, and cost-effectiveness estimates.
Judith Spijkerman, MD, of the University Medical Centre in Utrecht, the Netherlands, and colleagues compared immunogenicity of 4 different schedules using the 13-valent PCV (PCV13) to assess the optimal primary regimen with respect to antibody induction. The randomized clinical trial of healthy term infants in a general community in the Netherlands was conducted between June 2010 and January 2011, with 99 percent follow-up until age 12 months. Infants (n = 400) were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive PCV13 either at ages 2,4, and 6 months (2-4-6); at ages 3 and 5 months (3-5); at ages 2, 3, and 4 months (2-3-4); or at ages 2 and 4 months (2-4), with a booster dose at age 11.5 months.
The researchers found that one month after the booster dose, there were no differences in IgG (Immunoglobulin G) geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) between the schedules for 70 of 78 comparisons. The 2-4-6 schedule was superior to the 2-3-4 schedule for serotypes 18C and 23F and superior to the 2-4 schedule for serotypes 6B, 18C, and 23F. For serotype 1, the 3-5 schedule was superior to the 2-4-6, 2-3-4, and 2-4 schedules.
Secondary outcomes (GMCs measured 1 month after the primary series, at 8 months of age, and before the booster) demonstrated differences 1 month after the primary series. The 2-4-6 schedule was superior compared with the 3-5, 2-3-4, and 2-4 schedules for 3,9, and 11 serotypes, respectively. Differences between schedules persisted until the booster dose, the authors write.
To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial investigating immunogenicity of PCV13 in 4 different primary immunization schedules currently used in most high income countries. The primary outcome of this study, GMCs l month after the booster dose, showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the 4 schedules in IgG levels for most serotypes. However, differences between schedules were noted in secondary analyses. Our findings demonstrate that optimal timing of the primary series, i.e., older age at vaccinations combined with longer intervals between vaccinations, is important to maintain optimal antibody levels during the period between the primary series and the booster dose.
The choice of PCV schedule will require a balance between the need for early protection and maintaining protection between the primary series and the booster, in particular before herd effects offer clinical protection against vaccine serotype disease to as yet unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated infants. When herd immunity is established, clinical relevance of the observed differences in immune responses may become of minor importance, the researchers conclude.
This study was performed by order and for the account of the Dutch Ministry of Health by additional immunization program research funding. Pfizer kindly provided 1,400 PCV13 vaccines.
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
From Pandemic to Endemic: How the Protective Face Mask Market Is Evolving
August 2nd 2025Once a symbol of crisis, face masks have evolved into everyday essentials—driven not only by pandemic preparedness but by rising air pollution, cultural shifts, and workplace safety regulations. As innovation and demand grow worldwide, the protective face mask market is poised for long-term expansion well beyond COVID-19.
Sharps Safety Starts with Us: Why Infection Preventionists Must Lead the Charge
August 2nd 2025Sharps injuries remain a silent but serious threat in health care that infection preventionists are uniquely equipped to confront. With underreporting widespread and safety devices underused, it’s time for IPs to step into a leadership role, using their expertise in systems thinking, education, and policy to build a culture where staff protection is as prioritized as patient care.
The Green Revolution in SPD: From Hidden Cost to Frontline Change
August 2nd 2025As climate change accelerates, health care’s environmental impact faces increased scrutiny, with sterile processing departments (SPDs) emerging as key change agents. Often behind the scenes, SPD professionals can lead sustainability by turning routine practices into ecofriendly protocols that protect both patient and planetary health.