Moderna’s phase 3 trial data about its messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine will be presented tomorrow to the FDA’s advisory panel of experts who could then grant an emergency use authorization.
Now it’s Moderna’s turn. All eyes last week were on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as it went through the process of examining the data on the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which led to the vaccine being granted emergency use authorization (EUA). Now, while that vaccine is being divvied out among more than 500 distribution sites around the country, Moderna tomorrow will get its chance to present data about its messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine vaccine to the FDA’s advisory panel of experts, the Vaccines and Related Biologic Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC). If the panel likes what it hears, it could grant the EUA quickly.
The messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was created in collaboration between Moderna and investigators from the Vaccine Research Center at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The phase 3 trial data will be evaluated in a full-day meeting by a panel of experts, along with input from the public. A vote will then be taken on the therapy’s benefit-risk ratio for its prospective use as a preventive vaccine for confirmed COVID-19.
The meeting comes a week after Pfizer and BioNTech were granted an EUA by the FDA for their BNT162b2 vaccine, which was the first vaccine approved for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States. All signs point to a similar outcome for Moderna.
The phase 3 data submitted to the FDA as part of the EUA application can be found here.
Phase 3 Trial Makeup
The ongoing randomized, stratified, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study has included 30,351 participants who were randomized 1:1 to receive intramuscular injections of either 100 μg of mRNA-1273 or a placebo. The vaccine was administered in 2 doses given 28 days apart in adults who were 18 years of age or older.
The participants were stratified by age and health risk into 3 groups:
18 to <65 years of age and not at risk for progression to severe COVID-19
18 to <65 years of age and at risk for progression to severe COVID-19
≥65 years of age
The latter 2 groups constituted 41.4% of the study population. The risk for progression to severe was based on underlying comorbidities, including diabetes, chronic lung disease, severe obesity, significant cardiovascular disease, liver disease, or infection with HIV.
Included in the study were 24,907 (82.1%) participants who were considered to be at occupational risk for acquiring the SARS-CoV-2 infection, of whom 7613 (25.1%) were healthcare workers.
Trial Goals
Investigators sought a primary endpoint of vaccine efficacy for mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 occurring at least 14 days after the second dose in participants negative for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline.
The second primary efficacy endpoint included preventing severe COVID-19 and death due to the disease. Also included was disease occurring at least 14 days after the first or second dose of the vaccine, regardless of a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Efficacy Findings
At the interim analysis, the mRNA-1273 vaccine was found to have an efficacy of 94.5% (95% CI 86.5-97.8% against confirmed COVID-19 14 days after the second dose in participants without evidence of a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 11 cases of severe COVID-19 were observed, but all of them occurred in the placebo group.
Efficacy after just 1 dose of the vaccine was found to be 80.2% (95% CI, 55.2-92.5) in a median follow up time of 28 days. This cannot support a conclusion on single dose efficacy though, due to the fact that the numbers of participants and time of observation are limited.
Data was submitted as an amendment after the initial EUA request from a final efficacy analysis. However, the FDA has not yet independently verified the data from this dataset. The final scheduled efficacy analysis on the primary endpoint, demonstrated an efficacy of 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3-96.8). A lower efficacy was observed in participants ≥65 years of age compared to that in younger adults 18 to <65 years of age.
Safety Outcomes
The primary safety goal in the trial was to describe how safe the vaccine was after both 1 and 2 doses. Participants reported local reactions, systemic events, and antipyretic/pain medication usage from day 1 through day 7 after each dose. Participants who received the vaccine had a higher proportion of adverse events in comparison to the placebo group in the 7 days following its receival. The overall rate of adverse events were lower in the participants who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 baseline.
The rate of solicited local and systemic adverse reactions within 7 days of each dose were assessed through all groups. Across both of the age cohorts, the most frequently recorded local adverse reaction was pain, reported by 83.7% of vaccine recipients after the first dose (2.8%) and 88.4% after the second dose (4.1%). The median durations of pain were reported to be 2 days after dose 1 and 3 days after dose 2.
Participants in the age cohort of 18 to <64 years reported the highest rates of pain after the second dose, with 90.1% reporting any pain and 4.6% reporting Grade 3 pain. In the subgroup analyses of adults ≥65 years of age, the rates of solicited reactions were comparable to those observed in all of the participants.
Regarding unsolicited adverse events, a higher frequency was reported in the vaccine group (21.9%) compared to the placebo group (19.4%) within 28 days. These were primarily attributed to local and systemic reactogenicity. Participants who reported severe unsolicited events after any vaccine dose was 1.4%. These included headache, myalgia, arthralgia, injection site erythema, and injection site pain. Thirteen total deaths were reported in the trial, with 2 in the age cohort of >75 years who both had pre-existing cardiac disease.
VRBPAC Meeting
The meeting takes place tomorrow morning through the early evening, with a panel of FDA experts hosting an open session to discuss whether the evidence available shows that the benefits of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine outweigh its risks for use in individuals 18 years of age and older.
The FDA’s advisory committee’s votes have historically aligned with eventual marketing decisions. Considering the current rise of the COVID-19 pandemic and fears of a continuing second wave, coupled with the approval of Pfizer’s vaccine last week, an EUA approval is anticipated for mRNA-1273 by the VRBPAC.
This article originally appeared in Contagion®
The Critical Role of Clean Hospitals in Infection Control: Why You Should Join the Initiative
October 3rd 2024Clean Hospitals promotes global healthcare environmental hygiene, reducing infections and antimicrobial resistance. Join the movement to improve patient safety and staff protection through Clean Hospitals Day.
Health Care Linens: An Underrecognized Risk in Infection Prevention and Control
October 2nd 2024Health care linens are critical yet overlooked infection risks. Ensure proactive management by auditing laundering processes to prevent contamination and safeguard patient health across care settings. Read this article by Alexander Sundermann, DrPH, CIC, FAPIC.
Meet Infection Control Today's Editorial Advisory Board Member: Rebecca Leach, MPH, BSN, RN, CIC
September 30th 2024Meet the experts shaping infection prevention: Infection Control Today's Editorial Board members share insights, experiences, and cutting-edge strategies to enhance health care safety and quality. Meet Rebecca Leach, MPH, BSN, RN, CIC.