|Articles|July 17, 2012

Hospitals Encouraged to Examine Their Approach to Isolation

In a concise communication published in the May 2012 issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology,  Joan Vinski, MSN, RN, CIC, Mary Bertin, BSN, RN, CIC, Zhiyuan Sun, MS, Steven M. Gordon, MD, Daniel Bokar, James Merlino, MD, and Thomas G. Fraser, MD, report on their measurement of the impact of isolation on patient satisfaction.

The researchers used the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey to measure the effect of  isolation on patient satisfaction. Isolated patients reported lower scores for questions regarding physician communication and staff  responsiveness. Overall scores for these domains were lower in isolated than in nonisolated patients.

As Vinski, et al. (2012) explain, "Acute care hospital infection prevention programs commonly employ isolation practices to prevent cross-transmission of pathogens. Isolation has been recognized as having deleterious effects on patient throughput, safety, care, emotional well-being, and hospital  costs; methods to measure these effects are lacking. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) measures patient  satisfaction using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Hospitals subject  to the CMS Inpatient Prospective Payment System must collect and submit HCAHPS data. These data will comprise 30 percent of a  hospitals value-based purchasing score in CMS fiscal year 2013. "

The researchers note further, "This comparison of HCAHPS responses found an association between isolation and lower scores for physician communication and staff responsiveness. A trend toward lower scores was also seen for nursing communication and pain management. Isolation was also associated with a trend toward a deleterious effect on the patients perception of cleanliness and their willingness to recommend the hospital."

They add, "Isolation precautions are tools that benefit a hospitalized population and healthcare workers rather than the individual isolated. The inclusion of HCAHPS results in a hospitals value-based purchasing score raises the visibility of all procedures influencing a patients hospital experience, including environmental cleanliness and infection prevention protocols. This heightened awareness is an opportunity for infection prevention programs to reinforce reasons, adherence, and execution of isolation practices. It also compels infection prevention to examine their approach to isolation, assessing its impact on the totality of patient care and assuring that this tool is used judiciously."

Reference: Vinski J, et al. Impact of Isolation on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Scores: Is Isolation Isolating? Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.  Vol. 33, No. 5, May 2012.


Related to this article

Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Health care workers from the US speaking with other health care workers in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Is the Ebola outbreak in the DRC getting better? The answer depends on which numbers you examine. Several important indicators are moving in the right direction, including slower case growth and a declining Rₜ. But major gaps remain in contact tracing, testing, community deaths, safe burial coverage, and treatment capacity in some of the hardest-hit areas. ICT takes a deeper look at the latest outbreak data and why the numbers suggest cautious optimism, not victory.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.