|Articles|July 1, 2003

Infection Control Today - 07/2003: Toronto's Dance With SARS

Toronto's Dance With SARS

By Paul Webber

Severaldays after her Continental Airlines flight from Hong Kong touched down inToronto, family matriarch Kwan Sui-Chu died quietly from flu-like symptoms ather suburban home. She had not been to a hospital, and once symptomatic, she hadnot circulated in the general population her cause of death was listed asheart attack. Nobody knew about SARS at the time; her death did nottrigger anything in the coroners mind, said Dr. Jim Cairns, Ontariosdeputy chief coroner. If SARS had been limited to Sui-Chu, Torontos firstSARS outbreak might never have happened. Unfortunately, it wasnt limited, andthrough a series of events, it was about to get legs.

By the time Tsi Chi Kwai buried his mother, hetoo was symptomatic, and a highly infectious super-spreader.

Seeking relief at a local hospital, he laycoughing on an ER gurney for 12 hours, exposing more than 200 patients, nursesand doctors to this unknown pathogen. Patients who shared the hospital ER withKwai were transferred to other hospitals all over the city, transferred byemergency response personnel who didnt know to take precautions and who oftencarried more than one patient at a time. Cautious about overstating the risk andcausing panic, the Toronto Public Health Department issued an underwhelmingstatement that SARS was confined to a family who had recently traveled toHong Kong. One day after this lukewarm warning, Tsi Chi Kwai died.

As the magnitude of the problem becameunavoidable, waves of e-mails and faxes with updated (sometimes contradictory)information crashed into healthcare facilities from every direction. Everyhospital in Ontario a land mass more than twice the size of Texaswasordered to bar all visitors, volunteers and non-critical appointments. Hospitalsscreened everyone as they entered even staff members who just steppedoutside for a smoke. Double gloves, double gowns, masks and face shields weremandatory for contacts. First responders were gowned, gloved and masked for alltransfers and were instructed to clean their equipment and vehicles with aspecial accelerated hydrogen peroxide disinfectant. Alcohol handsanitizers and N95 respirators became hot commodities and were quickly in veryshort supply.

In the media, news of SARS pushed the pendingassault on Baghdad off the front pages. Thousands of people, includinghealthcare workers, were quarantined in their homes, and many peopleself-quarantined after suspected or known exposure. Toronto nurses were oftenavoided by friends and family, afraid of what might be incubating in theirlungs. One Hewlett-Packard employee went to work with SARS-like symptoms afterhaving been warned to stay home. Consequently the entire HP plant was shut downand 300 of his workmates quarantined. As a travel destination, for business orpleasure, Toronto was a pariah. Huge conferences were cancelled, as were manyflights into Torontos Pearson International Airport. Community functions andsporting events were postponed.

Chinese restaurants closed and the Asiandistricts of Toronto and other major cities looked abandoned.

No one in Toronto was unaffected by the spring2003 SARS outbreak. Dozens died (all traceable to the index cases).Paranoia-like fear of infectious disease ran rampant. The direct and indirectcosts to Canadian government, business and society will never be fully knowncertainlybillions of dollars.

As with most outbreaks though, some good thingscame out of the SARS experience. Canadian health officials at all levels arebetter prepared and aware of what level of coordinated effort will be requiredto battle SARS again, an influenza pandemic or biological terrorism. Dramaticbudget cuts to public health agencies in recent years were exposed and reversed.Proper hand hygiene was advertised so widely and aggressively during theoutbreak that it evolved into a societal norm. And as Canadian hospitals settleinto the new normal, infection control practitioners will continue to reapthe rewards of their deservedly higher profilea very good thing indeed.


Related to this article

Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Health care workers from the US speaking with other health care workers in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Is the Ebola outbreak in the DRC getting better? The answer depends on which numbers you examine. Several important indicators are moving in the right direction, including slower case growth and a declining Rₜ. But major gaps remain in contact tracing, testing, community deaths, safe burial coverage, and treatment capacity in some of the hardest-hit areas. ICT takes a deeper look at the latest outbreak data and why the numbers suggest cautious optimism, not victory.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.