Infection prevention and control resources and programming in Canadian long-term care facilities fall short of recommended standards, a new Queen's University study shows.
Led by professor of community health and epidemiology Dick Zoutman, the national survey of 488 facilities is the first comprehensive examination of these resources and programs in almost 20 years.
"It's critical that vulnerable long-term care residents be protected from largely preventable infections," says Zoutman, who is medical director of infection prevention and control at Kingston GeneralHospital and Providence Care. "More and better-trained infection control professionals are essential to providing effective infection surveillance and control programs."
Findings from the new Queen's study – the results of a 2005 survey – are published in the online pre-print version of the American Journal of Infection Control. The study mirrors Zoutman's earlier, groundbreaking studies of infection prevention and control in Canadian acute-care hospitals that have led to implementation of increased infection control resources.
Among key findings for Canadian long-term care facilities:
-- The average number of full-time equivalent infection control professionals (ICPs) per 250 beds was 0.6, compared to the recommended 1.0.
-- Only eight percent of ICPs were certified by the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology.
-- Only one-fifth of long-term care facilities had physicians or doctoral-level professions providing service to the infection control program.
-- Eighty-two percent of long-term care facilities infection prevention and control programs are conducting less than 80 percent of expert-suggested surveillance activities to identify infections.
-- Half (51 percent) of long-term care facilities are conducting less than 80 percent of suggested control activities to prevent the spread of infections.
The shortfalls identified in this study mean that many essential infection control activities in long-term care facilities are not being performed, with the end result being increased morbidity, mortality, and financial expense, notes co-author of the study Doug Ford, a research associate with Queen's Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine. Also on the research team is Jim Gauthier, ICP at Providence Care in Kingston.
Happy Hand Hygiene Day! Rethinking Glove Use for Safer, Cleaner, and More Ethical Health Care
May 5th 2025Despite their protective role, gloves are often misused in health care settings—undermining hand hygiene, risking patient safety, and worsening environmental impact. Alexandra Peters, PhD, points out that this misuse deserves urgent attention, especially today, World Hand Hygiene Day.
From the Derby to the Decontam Room: Leadership Lessons for Sterile Processing
April 27th 2025Elizabeth (Betty) Casey, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRCST, CHL, is the SVP of Operations and Chief Nursing Officer at Surgical Solutions in Overland, Kansas. This SPD leader reframes preparation, unpredictability, and teamwork by comparing surgical services to the Kentucky Derby to reenergize sterile processing professionals and inspire systemic change.
Show, Tell, Teach: Elevating EVS Training Through Cognitive Science and Performance Coaching
April 25th 2025Training EVS workers for hygiene excellence demands more than manuals—it requires active engagement, motor skills coaching, and teach-back techniques to reduce HAIs and improve patient outcomes.