Researchers with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Emory University recruited about 2,600 high-risk men to see if mailing them free HIV test kits might be a better method of detection than usual care. That seems to be the case, according to an original investigation published today in JAMA Internal Medicine. “Distribution of HIV self-tests provides a worthwhile mechanism to increase awareness of HIV infection and prevent transmission among” men who have sex with other men, investigators concluded.
Study participants were recruited through advertisements on social media, dating and music websites from March through August 2015. Participants included men in the United States who had anal sex in the last year and were either HIV-negative or not aware of their HIV status. They created an online account through which investigators could contact them. The self-test group comprised 1,325 men; the control group 1,340.
The men received $90 for completing surveys at the beginning and then at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and reported self-test results at 12 months. “Telephone call notes and laboratory test results were included in the analysis, which was completed from August 2017 through December 2018,” the study stated.
Men in the intervention group were mailed two oral fluid HIV self-tests and two finger-stick whole blood HIV self-tests. The control group got a link to local testing services for standard care.
The self-testing participants tested 3 or more times during the trial than the control group, 76.7% v. 22%. In addition, 25 infections were detected in the self-testing group, versus 11 in the control group. In addition, “The [self-test] participants reported 34 newly identified infections among social network members who used the self-tests,” the study stated.
About 1 million Americans have HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. More than two-thirds of newly diagnosed people are men who have sex with men; 1 in 6 of these men is unaware of his infection.
Robin MacGowan, the lead author and a CDC researcher, said that “self-testing is an important option for some people and in some situations, it saves time, offers privacy, and reaches people who may not be able to or willing to access existing testing services.”
Reflecting on the US Withdrawal from the World Health Organization
January 21st 2025An infection preventionist reels from the US exit from WHO, writing that it disrupts global health efforts, weakens infection control, and lacks research funding and support for low-income nations dependent on WHO for health care resources.
Infections Do Not Recognize International Borders: The Potential Impact of US Withdrawal From WHO
January 21st 2025The US withdrawal from WHO jeopardizes infection prevention, research funding, and global collaboration, disproportionately impacting low-income nations reliant on WHO support for equitable health care advancements.
Infection Intel:EvaClean Expands Global Reach With Microsplitting Partnership
January 20th 2025EvaClean partners with Microsplitting Ltd. to distribute its advanced disinfection systems and absorbents, revolutionizing infection prevention across health care, education, hospitality, and industrial sectors worldwide.