BOSTON-Two prominent American medical journals will no longer let pharmaceutical companies determine conclusions of studies. Instead, editors at The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet will rely on the researchers who conducted the work to write the conclusions to their studies.
This decision comes after reported cases of drug companies influencing and pressuring editorial staff members to print articles that incorrectly favored their product. In a few reported cases, companies attempted to block publication of a study if it was not favorable for their company.
Officials at both journals say this decision will give the power to the scientist conducting the experiment. While many studies are funded by pharmaceutical companies, the researchers will now have more independence in reporting their findings, rather than what a pharmaceutical company representative would like to have published.
Information from www.washingtonpost.com
CDC Urges Vigilance: New Recommendations for Monitoring and Testing H5N1 Exposures
July 11th 2025With avian influenza A(H5N1) infections surfacing in both animals and humans, the CDC has issued updated guidance calling for aggressive monitoring and targeted testing to contain the virus and protect public health.
IP LifeLine: Layoffs and the Evolving Job Market Landscape for Infection Preventionists
July 11th 2025Infection preventionists, once hailed as indispensable during the pandemic, now face a sobering reality: budget pressures, hiring freezes, and layoffs are reshaping the field, leaving many IPs worried about their future and questioning their value within health care organizations.
A Helping Hand: Innovative Approaches to Expanding Hand Hygiene Programs in Acute Care Settings
July 9th 2025Who knew candy, UV lights, and a college kid in scrubs could double hand hygiene adherence? A Pennsylvania hospital’s creative shake-up of its infection prevention program shows that sometimes it takes more than soap to get hands clean—and keep them that way.