ST. PAUL, Minn. -- The Minnesota Nurses Association (MNA) stands in solidarity with its national organization, the American Nurses Association, to urge a more cautious effort in the development of a national vaccination program against smallpox.
"We have too many questions, too many doubts to move at such breakneck speed through this process," said Erin Murphy, executive director of the MNA. Nurses are calling for a more thoughtful approach that examines issues from scientific, emotional and economic perspectives. Murphy pointed out member concerns that centered on several areas including:
-- the safety of patients and their families as well as nurses and their
own families
-- maintaining sufficient staffing throughout a crisis event
-- preventing retaliation against those refusing to be vaccinated
-- worker's compensation issues
-- defining the full scope of the volunteer task
The information being received by healthcare providers is changing on a daily basis and organizations are struggling with determining what is reliable. "I would characterize the atmosphere as 'frenzied,'" said Murphy, "and I certainly don't want our nurses to have to make such a weighty decision under such pressured circumstances."
MNA/ANA is one of several entities that are encouraging more caution as President Bush's program to immunize 500,000 front line healthcare workers is set to begin January 24, 2003. The Institute of Medicine, other unions and Minnesota's own Department of Health are calling for or executing delays in the implementation of the process.
MNA has established three guiding principles for its members to help them make informed decisions, realizing the personal risks prior to volunteering for any program.
Choice
-- Any MNA support is predicated upon a smallpox vaccination program is
that remains strictly voluntary.
Training
-- MNA will work to ensure that adequate training is provided for RNs who
respond as volunteers or as part of their employment to a terrorist
event. The organization encourages nurses to avail themselves of
educational opportunities, but advises them to assure trainers the
nurse's presence does not constitute a commitment.
Protection
-- MNA will work to ensure that adequate protection is provided for RNs,
both physically and legally.
With more than 16,500 members, MNA is the leading organization for registered nurses in the Midwest and is among the oldest and largest representatives of RNs for collective bargaining in the nation. Established in 1905, MNA is a multi-purpose organization that fosters high standards for nursing education and practice, and works to advance the profession through legislative activity. MNA is a constituent member of the American Nurses Association and its labor arm, the United American Nurses.
Source: Minnesota Nurses Association
A Helping Hand: Innovative Approaches to Expanding Hand Hygiene Programs in Acute Care Settings
July 9th 2025Who knew candy, UV lights, and a college kid in scrubs could double hand hygiene adherence? A Pennsylvania hospital’s creative shake-up of its infection prevention program shows that sometimes it takes more than soap to get hands clean—and keep them that way.
Broadening the Path: Diverse Educational Routes Into Infection Prevention Careers
July 4th 2025Once dominated by nurses, infection prevention now welcomes professionals from public health, lab science, and respiratory therapy—each bringing unique expertise that strengthens patient safety and IPC programs.
How Contaminated Is Your Stretcher? The Hidden Risks on Hospital Wheels
July 3rd 2025Despite routine disinfection, hospital surfaces, such as stretchers, remain reservoirs for harmful microbes, according to several recent studies. From high-touch areas to damaged mattresses and the effectiveness of antimicrobial coatings, researchers continue to uncover persistent risks in environmental hygiene, highlighting the critical need for innovative, continuous disinfection strategies in health care settings.