Bruce Y. Lee, MD, MBA, from the Public Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR) program at the University of Pittsburgh, and colleagues report in the November issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology that routine preoperative screening and decolonization of orthopedic surgery patients may save hospitals and third-party payors money while providing health benefits.
Lee, et al. (2010) acknowledge that patients undergoing orthopedic surgery are susceptible to methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, which can result in increased morbidity, hospital lengths of stay, and medical costs. They sought to estimate the economic value of routine preoperative MRSA screening and decolonization of orthopedic surgery patients.
The researchers used a computer simulation model to evaluate the economic value of implementing this strategy (compared with no preoperative screening or decolonization) among orthopedic surgery patients from both the third-party payor and hospital perspectives. They report that sensitivity analyses explored the effects of varying MRSA colonization prevalence, the cost of screening and decolonization, and the probability of decolonization success.
Lee, et al. (2010) report that preoperative MRSA screening and decolonization was strongly cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio less than $6,000 per quality-adjusted life year) from the third-party payor perspective even when MRSA prevalence was as low as 1 percent, decolonization success was as low as 25 percent, and decolonization costs were as high as $300 per patient. The researchers add that in most scenarios, this strategy was less costly and more effective than no screening. They say that from the hospital perspective, preoperative MRSA screening and decolonization was the economically dominant strategy for all scenarios they explored.
Reference: Lee BY, Wiringa AE, Bailey RR, Goyal V, Tsui B, Lewis GJ, Muder RR and Harrison LM. The Economic Effect of Screening Orthopedic Surgery Patients Preoperatively for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:1130-1138.
CDC Urges Vigilance: New Recommendations for Monitoring and Testing H5N1 Exposures
July 11th 2025With avian influenza A(H5N1) infections surfacing in both animals and humans, the CDC has issued updated guidance calling for aggressive monitoring and targeted testing to contain the virus and protect public health.
IP LifeLine: Layoffs and the Evolving Job Market Landscape for Infection Preventionists
July 11th 2025Infection preventionists, once hailed as indispensable during the pandemic, now face a sobering reality: budget pressures, hiring freezes, and layoffs are reshaping the field, leaving many IPs worried about their future and questioning their value within health care organizations.
A Helping Hand: Innovative Approaches to Expanding Hand Hygiene Programs in Acute Care Settings
July 9th 2025Who knew candy, UV lights, and a college kid in scrubs could double hand hygiene adherence? A Pennsylvania hospital’s creative shake-up of its infection prevention program shows that sometimes it takes more than soap to get hands clean—and keep them that way.