Touveneau et al. (2013) conducted a single center, cluster randomized controlled effectiveness trial was conducted to compare two novel hand hygiene (HH) promotional strategies. Sixty six wards were randomized to standard HH promotion (control), standard promotion plus HH performance feedback (FB), or FB plus active patient participation (PP). While FB seemed to be well accepted by HCWs, the introduction of PP proved to be more challenging.
A ward-level case study was conducted through three focus groups with ward staff and six interviews with ward head nurses. Participants were selected following an extremes sampling strategy regarding adoption strength. The hospitals infection control nursing staff participated in additional focus group. All sessions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was deductive (using a framework of themes that had been previously established) and inductive (grounded theory).
Four main and 12 sub-themes emerged: Context (patient emancipation, behavioral norms, experiential stages of change, infrastructure); Risk knowledge (nil); Interaction (means of communication, emotions); Implementation process (study and implementation design, message delivery, leadership, unintended effects, time and workload, sustainability). The action of confronting another person about a failure became less emotionally menacing through positive experiences, innovative means of communication, and institutionalization of the project. Individual leadership engagement had a major impact on implementation success. Exclusion from intervention arms motivated control wards to improve HH performance independently.
The researchers say this qualitative research permitted to explain the quantitative study findings and to explore the evolutionary and complex implementation process of PP. While PP remains challenging, it is their hope that the findings of this study may facilitate future patient participation projects.
Reference: S Touveneau, L Clack, F Da Liberdade Jantarada, A Stewardson, M Schindler, M Bourrier, D Pittet and H Sax. Poster presentation P167 at the 2nd International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control (ICPIC 2013): The challenges of implementing patient participation in hand hygiene results of a qualitative inquiry in the framework of a randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2013, 2(Suppl 1):P167 doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-S1-P167
The Guardians of Animal Health: Who Are Veterinary Infection Preventionists?
March 21st 2025Veterinary infection control experts Leslie Kollmann, BS, AAS, CVT, CIC, Denise Waiting, LVT, and Leslie Landis, LVT, BS, discuss challenges, zoonotic disease risks, and the importance of education, collaboration, and resource development in animal care facilities.
The Latest on CLABSIs and CAUTIs: Evidence-Based Approaches for Infection Prevention
February 27th 2025Health care–associated infections like CLABSIs and CAUTIs threaten patient safety. Learn evidence-based strategies, new technologies, and prevention protocols to reduce these infections and improve outcomes.
Resilience and Innovation: The Pivotal Contributions of Black Americans to Health Care and Medicine
February 24th 2025During Black History Month, we honor the resilience and contributions of Black medical professionals in health care. Despite barriers, they have led transformative changes, advocating for equitable access and medical excellence. Recognizing their impact ensures a more inclusive health care future for all.
Glove Usage Guideline: From The Joint Commission, CDC, and World Health Organization
February 17th 2025Proper glove use is crucial in health care settings to prevent infections. Guidelines from TJC, CDC, and WHO stress correct selection, usage, and disposal to minimize health care–associated infections (HAIs) and cross-contamination risks. Infection preventionists (IPs) play a key role in educating staff, enforcing compliance, and improving patient safety through standardized glove practices.